- From: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 08:34:26 -0800
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
The addition of rdf:nodeID is handy, especially from the standpoint of end users new to RDF who balk at creating universal URI identifiers for all their resources. However, using the name "rdf:nodeID" both for the description of the resource and for the reference is inconsistent and confusing. XML has a long history of using "ID" and "IDREF" as names of an identified XML node and the node that refers to it, respectively. Similarly, RDF uses "rdf:about" and "rdf:resource" for the similar concepts based upon resource reference URIs. Can't we make RDF more internally consistent and consistent with XML by using "rdf:nodeID" and "rdf:nodeIDRef", respectively? Garret
Received on Sunday, 12 January 2003 13:00:14 UTC