- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isis.unc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:14:51 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 08:03 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > Bijan, > > Thank you for your comments. You're welcome. > I think your preference here is clear enough, without paraphrasing: > > [[ >> Section 4 of Concepts and Abstract should be struck. > ]] Yes. > This issue has already been raised, and is subject to some debate, and, > without prejudicing the outcome of our debate, I'm pretty sure there > will be some big changes. I'm glad. I will point out that, if normative, i don't see that it's possible (or rather feasible) for RDFCore to produce version of this section that is both substantive and appropriate. Now, of course, just because I don't see that it's possible, doesn't mean it isn't possible. > Brian: do we need to raise a separate issue for this, or can we tag it > onto an existing one? (Your call.) I think I support my desire with distinct, individually sufficient reasons. So long as they all are addressed, I don' t care how it's recorded. Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 18:13:51 UTC