- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:35:48 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: gk@ninebynine.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote: > > There is also Section 2.2 of the RDF Primer that I already have pointed out > in one of the email messages that gave rise to this comment. I do not > believe that any changes have been suggested for this section. Peter-- The general nature of the change I intended (and still intend) to make in Section 2.2 of the Primer was discussed in the original thread that gave rise to this issue, and hasn't changed; see, e.g., message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0273.html One way of making the necessary distinction that occurred to me was to point out that a human might read a lot of meaning into triples such as ex:index.html dc:creator exstaff:85740 because there seem to be words in there, but as far as a machine is concerned, what it sees might as well be something like fy:joefy.iunm ed:dsfbups fytubgg:85740 and any English text describing the meaning of dc:creator found at the Dublin Core site also provides no additional meaning as far as the machine is concerned. Any meaning beyond this being an RDF triple with the indicated components (and any meaning of the graph in which this triple appears beyond that specified by RDF Semantics) is "social meaning" of a sort, and would be based on extra-RDF mechanisms. --Frank -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Monday, 17 March 2003 14:36:09 UTC