Re: [closed] macgregor-01, Distinguishing asserted and non-asserted triples

This decision is acceptable, I approve.

At 02:00 PM 3/28/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:
>You raised made a last call comment "Distinguishing asserted and 
>non-asserted triples", captured in:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-01
>
>The RDFCore WG has resolved, per:
>
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0124.html
>
>to accept this comment, as follows:
>
>RDF does not provide means to distinguish asserted and non-asserted triples.
>
>The specific text that gave rise to this comment is being removed.
>
>Further, the RDF Concepts document (and others) will be reviewed for 
>confusing use of the term "asserted" in light of this comments.
>
>Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating
>whether this decision is acceptable.

=====================================
Robert MacGregor
Project Leader
macgregor@isi.edu
Phone: 310/448-8423, Fax:  310/822-6592
Mobile: 310/251-8488

USC Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90292
=====================================

Received on Friday, 28 March 2003 12:27:22 UTC