- From: Bob MacGregor <macgregor@ISI.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 06:15:56 -0800
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Received on Friday, 28 March 2003 12:27:22 UTC
This decision is acceptable, I approve. At 02:00 PM 3/28/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote: >You raised made a last call comment "Distinguishing asserted and >non-asserted triples", captured in: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-01 > >The RDFCore WG has resolved, per: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0124.html > >to accept this comment, as follows: > >RDF does not provide means to distinguish asserted and non-asserted triples. > >The specific text that gave rise to this comment is being removed. > >Further, the RDF Concepts document (and others) will be reviewed for >confusing use of the term "asserted" in light of this comments. > >Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating >whether this decision is acceptable. ===================================== Robert MacGregor Project Leader macgregor@isi.edu Phone: 310/448-8423, Fax: 310/822-6592 Mobile: 310/251-8488 USC Information Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90292 =====================================
Received on Friday, 28 March 2003 12:27:22 UTC