- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:18:20 +0000
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
At 23:02 20/02/2003 +0000, Jan Grant wrote: >On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > There's a substantive issue but to play games I will start with it as > > > > Procedurally: > > > > [[ > > The negative testcase > > rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf > > > > is recorded as having been approved at > > > > RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-01-10 > > > > however it is not recorded as such in the minutes; nor was it in the > agenda. > > > > I request that the positive test case > > rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf > > as approved at > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0235.html > > > > be shown in this document. > > ]] > > > > moreover, > > [[ > > I think the test was correct as originally stated and is currently > incorrect. > > ]] > > > > (I am happy to ignore the procedural issue, really - but I did follow the > > links and was disappointed = i.e. I still can't tell why this test got > > changed - nor can I tell why I didn't vote against such change) > >Brian, please give this an issue number. Jeremy, This comment has been recorded as http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#jjc-01 The RDFCore WG will consider this comment and get back to you in due course. Brian
Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 08:51:07 UTC