- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:12:01 +0000
- To: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Susan, Thank you for your comments. I think there's nothing controversial here, and propose to adopt them as offered. Brian: I'm not sure we need to raise a tracking issue here, as the comments are all editorial in nature... or do we? #g At 09:50 PM 2/23/03 -0800, Susan Lesch wrote: >These are minor editorial comments for your "Resource Description >Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax" Last Call Working Draft [1]. > >minor typos: >s/world-wide/worldwide/ >s/references.The/references. The/ >s/it's use/its use/ >s/website/Web site/ >s/XML Namespaces/Namespaces in XML/ >s/Normal Form C/Normalization Form C/ >in 6.5.1 s/RDF Literals/RDF literals/ >in 6.5.2 s/RDF Graphs/RDF graphs/ >in 7 s/RDF URI Reference/RDF URI reference/ >s/itself, at least, also/itself, at least, and also/ > >cite { color: navy } is nice but close to link blue. I'd pick another >color not used for links in the W3C style sheet. What does navy mean? >(It appears in both normative and informative sections.) > > The framework is designed so that vocabularies can be layered on > top of a core. The RDF core and RDF vocabulary definition (RDF > schema) languages [RDF-VOCABULARY] are the first such vocabularies. >sounds like a core layered on a core. I'm not sure if that is what you >meant. > >This sentence: > A convention used by some linear representations of an RDF graph to > allow several statements to reference the same blank node is to use > a blank node identifier, which is a local identifier that can be > distinguished from all URIs and literals. >could read something like: > To allow several statements to reference the same blank node, some > linear representations of an RDF graph use a blank node identifier. > This local identifier can be distinguished from all URIs and literals. > >Please avoid we (see http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#ref-PRONOUNS). >I think you can say (without the we): > assume that the URI part (i.e. excluding fragment identifier) > indicates a Web resource with an RDF representation > >In 3.1, property is aka predicate and in 6.1, predicate is aka property. >I would say this the same way both times. > >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/ > >Best wishes for your project, >-- >Susan Lesch http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/ >mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.858.483.4819 >World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:20:52 UTC