w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from October to December 2001 by date

Monday, 31 December 2001

• AW: Tree Navigation - Javascript Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 29 December 2001

• orinoco was Re: network HOWTO jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• network HOWTO jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Woolley
• RE: Minimal Browser Capabilities Harry Woodrow
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Jim Ley
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Woolley
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Tina Marie Holmboe

Friday, 28 December 2001

• Lynx Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities lynn.alford@jcu.edu.au
• another mini distribution of linux: David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Scott Luebking
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Woolley
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Woolley
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Woolley
• Re: empty white screen instead of NBCOlympics site [Re: Olympic Web Sites] David Woolley
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Woolley
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Woolley
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Woolley
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Woolley
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Woolley

Saturday, 29 December 2001

• Re: CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Vadim Plessky

Friday, 28 December 2001

• Re: CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Tina Marie Holmboe
• January 2002 Accessible Web Design Course Kynn Bartlett
• New mini-distribution of Linux for the visually impaired Vadim Plessky
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• Re: CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Vadim Plessky
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Harry Woodorw
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Harry Woodorw
• Re: CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Harry Woodorw
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• Re: CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Vadim Plessky
• Re: CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Vadim Plessky
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• RE: CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Harry Woodorw
• Re: CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Vadim Plessky
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Harry Woodrow
• Re: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Jim Ley

Thursday, 27 December 2001

• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report David Poehlman
• CSS [Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities] Vadim Plessky
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report William R Williams/R5/USDAFS
• Re: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report David Poehlman
• Re: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Harry Woodrow
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Scott Luebking
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Scott Luebking
• Re: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Poehlman
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Olympic Web Sites Vadim Plessky
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• RE: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page Kynn Bartlett
• RE: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page Harry Woodrow
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Harry Woodrow
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: large, but simple tables Charles McCathieNevile
• WCAG usability Re: Multiple versions of a web page Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Harry Woodrow
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Harry Woodrow
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Tables and CSS Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Charles McCathieNevile
• Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe

Wednesday, 26 December 2001

• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Poehlman
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe

Thursday, 27 December 2001

• Re: Olympic Web Sites Access Systems

Wednesday, 26 December 2001

• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett

Thursday, 27 December 2001

• Re: Olympic Web Sites Vadim Plessky
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 26 December 2001

• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Poehlman
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Joe Clark
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Poehlman
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Joe Clark
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Joe Clark
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Scott Luebking
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Poehlman
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Kynn Bartlett
• Re: empty white screen instead of NBCOlympics site Vadim Plessky
• Re: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: empty white screen instead of NBCOlympics site Kynn Bartlett
• Re: empty white screen instead of NBCOlympics site [Re: Olympic Web Sites] Vadim Plessky
• RE: empty white screen instead of NBCOlympics site [Re: Olympic Web Sites] Harry Woodrow
• RE: empty white screen instead of NBCOlympics site [Re: Olympic Web Sites] Michael R. Burks
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• empty white screen instead of NBCOlympics site [Re: Olympic Web Sites] Vadim Plessky
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Poehlman
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• RE: Why use a text-based browser? Harry Woodrow
• Re: Why use a text-based browser? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Why use a text-based browser? Vadim Plessky
• _Moulin Rouge_ Joe Clark
• Re: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: SVG - A thought Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Updated Bobby /approved sites what are that? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Phillip Pi
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• Why use a text-based browser? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessibility Questions Charles McCathieNevile
• Fwd: IE5.1/Mac ships with CSS improvements Vadim Plessky
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• Accessibility Questions Kristy@pretzel.com.au
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Tables and CSS Ineke van der Maat

Tuesday, 25 December 2001

• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Phillip Pi

Wednesday, 26 December 2001

• Re: Tables and CSS Vadim Plessky

Tuesday, 25 December 2001

• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Scott Luebking
• Re: Tables and CSS David Poehlman
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report David Poehlman
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Phillip Pi
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report David Poehlman
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Tables and CSS Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Tables and CSS Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Scott Luebking
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Phillip Pi
• Jacob Nielen has two reports Harry Woodrow
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report David Poehlman
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Scott Luebking
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Access Systems
• Re: Tables and CSS David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Poehlman
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities David Poehlman
• Re: Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Degrading Gracefully and Browser Testing Suites Vadim Plessky
• Re: Tables and CSS Vadim Plessky
• Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities Vadim Plessky
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Vadim Plessky
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Kynn Bartlett
• Tables and CSS Kynn Bartlett
• Minimal Browser Capabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Jakob Nielsen's PDF format report Kynn Bartlett
• Degrading Gracefully and Browser Testing Suites Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Access Systems
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Vadim Plessky
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Vadim Plessky

Monday, 24 December 2001

• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Seth Rothberg
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Phillip Pi
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Poehlman
• The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about pdf: David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Vadim Plessky
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Vadim Plessky
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Vadim Plessky
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Access Systems
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Access Systems
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Amazon Access Site Revisited Patrick Burke
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Patrick Burke
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Vadim Plessky
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Vadim Plessky
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Woolley
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking

Sunday, 23 December 2001

• Re: large, but simple tables Access Systems
• RE: large, but simple tables Jim Thatcher
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Some questions from CHI-WEB people David Woolley
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Woolley
• Re: large, but simple tables David Woolley
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Poehlman
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Poehlman
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 22 December 2001

• Some questions from CHI-WEB people Scott Luebking
• W3C and secrecy (was Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility) Charles F. Munat
• large, but simple tables Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Updated Bobby /approved sites what are that? Chris Croome
• Re: Flash508.com Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Cynthia Waddell

Friday, 21 December 2001

• Re: Flash508.com David Poehlman
• Re: Flash508.com Larry Goldberg
• Re: Flash508.com Joel Ward
• Flash508.com Joe Clark
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Steven McCaffrey
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Carol Foster
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Joel Ward
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Carol Foster
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Jason Megginson
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Joel Ward
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Joel Ward
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Vadim Plessky
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Vadim Plessky
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Jason Megginson
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Ken Reader
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility George Kerscher
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Joel Ward
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Poehlman
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Jon Hanna
• Re: Re[2]: svg degrades to gif/jpg Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Re[2]: svg degrades to gif/jpg Vadim Plessky
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Vadim Plessky
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Updated Bobby /approved sites what are that? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems
• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility George Kerscher

Thursday, 20 December 2001

• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg jonathan chetwynd

Friday, 21 December 2001

• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley

Thursday, 20 December 2001

• RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Denise Wood
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Joel Ward
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Joel Ward
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Carol Foster
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Carol Foster
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility Access Systems

Friday, 21 December 2001

• Updated Bobby /approved sites what are that? Ineke van der Maat

Thursday, 20 December 2001

• Acrobat PDF & Accessibility William R Williams/R5/USDAFS
• Re: amazon's new web site in wired: Access Systems
• Re: amazon's new web site in wired: Kynn Bartlett
• Re: amazon's new web site in wired: Kynn Bartlett
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg rdiblas@wpo.it.luc.edu
• Re[2]: svg degrades to gif/jpg Chris Lilley
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• RE: SVG - A thought SHARPE, Ian
• amazon's new web site in wired: David Poehlman
• Re: SVG - A thought Vadim Plessky
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Vadim Plessky
• RE: SVG - A thought Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Disability statistics cynthia.waddell@icdri.org
• RE: SVG - A thought maxdunn@siliconpublishing.com
• RE: SVG - A thought maxdunn@siliconpublishing.com
• Re: Updated Bobby Charles F. Munat
• Re: Updated Bobby Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Updated Bobby Charles F. Munat
• Re: Updated Bobby Kynn Bartlett
• Konq/E [Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg] Vadim Plessky
• Re: Updated Bobby Charles F. Munat
• Re: Multiple versions of a web page David Woolley
• Re: SVG - A thought David Woolley
• Multiple versions of a web page Scott Luebking
• RE: Disability statistics Denise Wood

Wednesday, 19 December 2001

• Re: Berners-Lee awarded prize Denise Wood
• Re[2]: SVG - A thought Chris Lilley
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Access Systems

Thursday, 20 December 2001

• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Vadim Plessky
• Re: SVG - A thought Vadim Plessky
• Re: SVG - A thought Vadim Plessky
• Re: SVG - A thought Vadim Plessky

Wednesday, 19 December 2001

• Re: Expert Meeting on Internet Accessibility for Persons with Intellectual Disability jonathan chetwynd
• Expert Meeting on Internet Accessibility for Persons with Intellectual Disability jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Berners-Lee awarded prize Charles F. Munat
• Re: Updated Bobby Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Updated Bobby Jon Hanna
• Re: Updated Bobby Charles F. Munat

Thursday, 20 December 2001

• Re: Updated Bobby Hoehnermusikfan

Wednesday, 19 December 2001

• Berners-Lee awarded prize Denise Wood
• The Commercialization of Web Accessibility Joe Clark
• Re: Updated Bobby Kynn Bartlett
• Re: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility Steven McCaffrey
• RE: Updated Bobby Jon Hanna
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Access Systems
• Updated Bobby Ineke van der Maat
• Re: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility David Poehlman
• SVG>gif>text browser survey for: object vs embed? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: SVG - A thought Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Masayasu Ishikawa
• RE: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility Simon White
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: SVG - A thought Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: OnChange in dropdown combo box used for navigation Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: OnChange in dropdown combo box used for navigation Vadim Plessky
• Re: SVG - A thought Vadim Plessky
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Vadim Plessky
• Re: Disability statistics Access Systems
• Re: Disability statistics Denise Wood
• Re: Disability statistics Access Systems

Tuesday, 18 December 2001

• Re: OnChange in dropdown combo box used for navigation David Woolley

Wednesday, 19 December 2001

• RE: Web page titles PERRY, Grant
• Re: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility Kelly Ford

Tuesday, 18 December 2001

• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: OnChange in dropdown combo box used for navigation Jim Ley
• Re: OnChange in dropdown combo box used for navigation Al Gilman
• Re: OnChange in dropdown combo box used for navigation David Poehlman
• Re: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility Asif
• Re: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility jonathan chetwynd
• Re: SVG - A thought David Woolley
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg David Woolley
• Re: Web page titles David Woolley
• Re: The Commercialization of Web Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• OnChange in dropdown combo box used for navigation STELZER,MELINDA (Non-HP-PaloAlto,ex1)
• The Commercialization of Web Accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• Web page titles Joe Clark
• SVG - A thought SHARPE, Ian
• Re: Web page titles David Poehlman
• Re: Web page titles Kelly Ford
• Web page titles Jo Donkin
• Re: svg degrades to gif/jpg Charles McCathieNevile
• svg degrades to gif/jpg jonathan chetwynd
• Re: FWD: Announcement: Mozilla accessibility alpha is ready Phillip Pi
• Re: Disability statistics Hoehnermusikfan
• Re: FWD: Announcement: Mozilla accessibility alpha is ready Access Systems
• FWD: Announcement: Mozilla accessibility alpha is ready Phillip Pi
• RE: Disability statistics Tai Wee Fatt, Tommy
• Re: Disability statistics Access Systems

Monday, 17 December 2001

• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Disability statistics Access Systems
• combi-box problem jonathan chetwynd
• A paradigm shift (was FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Steven McCaffrey
• HTML form field labelling SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Disability statistics Denise Wood
• RE: Disability statistics Cynthia Waddell
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• 508 RE: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disability statistics Vadim Plessky

Sunday, 16 December 2001

• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett

Monday, 17 December 2001

• Fw: Disability statistics Ineke van der Maat

Sunday, 16 December 2001

• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Vadim Plessky
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Disability statistics Vadim Plessky
• RE: Disability statistics Michael R. Burks
• RE: Disability statistics Access Systems
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: Disability statistics Michael R. Burks
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• some topics require a stop sign. Here is a stop sign: David Poehlman
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Vadim Plessky
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: Disability statistics Harry Woodrow
• RE: Disability statistics Denise Wood
• Re: commercials: what could be worse than banner ads? David Poehlman
• Re: Disability statistics Vadim Plessky
• Re: Disability statistics Vadim Plessky
• Re: Disability statistics Rowan Smith
• Re: Disability statistics Vadim Plessky
• Re: Disability statistics Vadim Plessky
• Re: Disability statistics Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• Re: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• RE: Disability statistics Harry Woodrow
• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Disability statistics Denise Wood
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: Disability statistics Denise Wood
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disability statistics Denise Wood
• Re: Disability statistics Denise Wood
• Re: Disability statistics Paul Koenig
• Re: commercials: what could be worse than banner ads? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Disability statistics Denise Wood

Saturday, 15 December 2001

• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Kynn Bartlett
• Re: commercials: what could be worse than banner ads? David Woolley
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Michael R. Burks
• happy holidays and new year. Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• commercials: what could be worse than banner ads? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Jim Thatcher
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Access Systems
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Woolley
• Re: Disability statistics Access Systems
• Re: Disability statistics Access Systems
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Disability statistics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Disability statistics Access Systems
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Harry Woodrow
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Access Systems
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Harry Woodrow
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Woolley
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Jim Thatcher
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Corss-post Re: how can faculty be advised on this project? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Scott Luebking
• Re: how can faculty be advised on this project? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually David Poehlman

Friday, 14 December 2001

• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Scott Luebking
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Scott Luebking
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Access Systems
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Cynthia Waddell
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually David Poehlman
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Scott Luebking
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Steven McCaffrey
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Michael R. Burks
• RE: how can faculty be advised on this project? Denise Wood
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Jim Thatcher
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Phillip Pi
• Re: how can faculty be advised on this project? David Poehlman
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Jon Hanna
• Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Denise Wood
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Denise Wood
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Phillip Pi
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Michael R. Burks
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Denise Wood
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Michael R. Burks
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Harry Woodrow
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Harry Woodrow
• Re: Label in NN6 and Mozilla Jo Miller
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired SHARPE, Ian
• RE: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Jon Hanna
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Joel Ward
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Aaron Smith
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Carol Foster
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Michael R. Burks
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Jim Thatcher
• Label in NN6 and Mozilla Was: [Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired] Chris Croome
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired John Morse
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Michael R. Burks
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Michael R. Burks
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Michael R. Burks
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Access Systems
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired david.bacon
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Jason Megginson
• Re: Bobby now costs Access Systems
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired SHARPE, Ian
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Bobby Denise Wood
• Bobby now costs Harry Woodorw
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Access Systems
• RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Michael R. Burks
• FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Denise Wood
• Re: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Scott Luebking

Thursday, 13 December 2001

• Accessible Art Web Site Adam Alonzo

Wednesday, 12 December 2001

• _Moulin Rouge_ Joe Clark
• RE: Olympic web site SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Poor DVD menu design Harry Woodorw

Tuesday, 11 December 2001

• RE: Information on accessibility issues of XFORMS Pedlow, Robert
• Re: Olympic Web Sites David Woolley
• Re: Information on accessibility of XFORMS David Woolley
• Re: Olympic Web Sites Access Systems
• RE: Information on accessibility of XFORMS Al Gilman
• RE: Information on accessibility of XFORMS Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Information on accessibility of XFORMS SHARPE, Ian
• DVD accessibility Joe Clark
• Olympic Web Sites Michael R. Burks
• Re: Poor DVD menu design David Poehlman
• Re: Poor DVD menu design geoff freed
• Re: Poor DVD menu design David Poehlman
• Re: Poor DVD menu design geoff freed
• RE: Information on accessibility issues of XFORMS Jon Hanna
• RE: Information on accessibility issues of XFORMS SHARPE, Ian
• Re: information on accessibility issues for XFORMS David Woolley

Monday, 10 December 2001

• RE: Deleted text & Strike-through Mike Scott
• information on accessibility issues for XFORMS Pedlow, Robert
• RE: Deleted text & Strike-through Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: policy Vadim Plessky
• RE: Deleted text & Strike-through Jon Hanna
• Re: Display Notification: Using Character Sets to Hide Email Addresses From Harvesters Kynn Bartlett
• Re: media: Opera 6.0 for Windows Launched After Record-Breaking Beta Kynn Bartlett
• Deleted text & Strike-through Mike Scott
• Re policy was Re: media: Opera 6.0 for Windows Launched After Record-Breaking Beta jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Pop-up windows -- is there any situation where they are OK? Chris Croome
• RE: media: Opera 6.0 for Windows Launched After Record-Breaking B eta Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: media: Opera 6.0 for Windows Launched After Record-Breaking Beta Vadim Plessky
• Re: Poor DVD menu design David Poehlman
• RE: Poor DVD menu design SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Fw: [webwatch] Fw: [htmldesigners] What's the difference visually?... Jim Thatcher

Sunday, 9 December 2001

• media: Opera 6.0 for Windows Launched After Record-Breaking Beta David Poehlman
• OT: Poor DVD Menu Design Phillip Pi
• Re: Fw: [webwatch] Fw: [htmldesigners] What's the difference visually?... Graham Oliver
• Re: Fw: [webwatch] Fw: [htmldesigners] What's the difference visually?... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fw: [webwatch] Fw: [htmldesigners] What's the difference visually?... David Woolley
• Fw: [webwatch] Fw: [htmldesigners] What's the difference visually?... David Poehlman

Saturday, 8 December 2001

• Re: Nov 30th: The Adobe SVG Viewer is now available on Linux Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: Nov 30th: The Adobe SVG Viewer is now available on Linux jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Nov 30th: The Adobe SVG Viewer is now available on Linux Vadim Plessky
• Nov 30th: The Adobe SVG Viewer is now available on Linux jonathan chetwynd
• Re: SGB Speaking Graphical Browser (or desktop) David Poehlman
• Re: SGB Speaking Graphical Browser (or desktop) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: SGB Speaking Graphical Browser (or desktop) jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Pop-up windows -- is there any situation where they are OK? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: what's the catch? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: what's the catch? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: SGB Speaking Graphical Browser (or desktop) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fw: Student created websites Access Systems

Friday, 7 December 2001

• SGB Speaking Graphical Browser (or desktop) jonathan chetwynd
• Fw: IBM Home Page Reader (HPR) 3.02 English update available for download David Poehlman
• January 2002 Accessible Web Design Course Kynn Bartlett
• Re: what's the catch? David Poehlman
• Re: what's the catch? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Macromedia Accessibility Solutions Kit: opinions? askaria@vrinet.com
• Re: Macromedia Accessibility Solutions Kit: opinions? Joel Ward
• Macromedia Accessibility Solutions Kit: opinions? holstius@msu.edu
• Fw: Student created websites David Poehlman
• media:NYTimes.com: Building Web Pages Without the Drudgery of HTML David Poehlman
• what's the catch? David Poehlman

Thursday, 6 December 2001

• Re: Help is obsolete Al Gilman
• Visibility and Display the answers DAN BILLINGSLEY
• National Organization on Disability Website Craig Hadley
• Re: Help is obsolete Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Al Gilman
• RE: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses DAN BILLINGSLEY
• Help is obsolete Al Gilman

Wednesday, 5 December 2001

• Re: JavaScript / CSS Wizards Please Help Jim Ley
• Re: Pop-up windows -- is there any situation where they are OK? David Woolley
• Re: Pop-up windows -- is there any situation where they are OK? David Woolley
• Re: JavaScript / CSS Wizards Please Help David Woolley
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript David Woolley
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript Tom Hall
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript jonathan chetwynd
• Re: summary vs. caption Joe Clark
• Re: Axis attribute Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Pop-up windows -- is there any situation where they are OK? David Poehlman
• Pop-up windows -- is there any situation where they are OK? Chris Croome
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Tree Navigation - Javascript SHARPE, Ian
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript Vadim Plessky
• Re: JavaScript / CSS Wizards Please Help Vadim Plessky
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript Jim Ley
• Re: Slashdot: lively debate on unix and accessibility Vadim Plessky
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript David Woolley
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript David Woolley
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript David Woolley
• Re: Tree Navigation - Javascript jonathan chetwynd
• Slashdot: lively debate on unix and accessibility jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Mike Scott
• RE: Tree Navigation Dr Denise Wood
• RE: Axis attribute Al Gilman
• RE: Axis attribute Jim Thatcher
• Tree Navigation - Javascript Sharon Dennison

Tuesday, 4 December 2001

• screen readers and @aural styles [was: RE: Fw: putting reader text...] Al Gilman
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Terje Bless
• Re: JavaScript / CSS Wizards Please Help Jim Ley
• Re: Axis attribute Al Gilman
• Ask Slashdot: What Accessibility Options Exist for Unix? Geoff Deering
• JavaScript / CSS Wizards Please Help Bailey, Bruce
• RE: summary vs. caption Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: summary vs. caption Phill Jenkins
• summary vs. caption Denise_Wood@operamail.com
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses David Woolley
• summary vs. caption Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses David Woolley
• RE: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Terry Brainerd Chadwick

Monday, 3 December 2001

• Re: Using Character Sets to Hide Email Addresses From Harvesters David Woolley
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses David Poehlman
• RE: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Mike Scott
• RE: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Jim Thatcher
• RE: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Rand, Robert
• RE: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Phill Jenkins
• RE: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Mike Scott
• The talking penguin (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Al Gilman
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Kirk Walker
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Charles McCathieNevile
• Axis attribute Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Phill Jenkins
• Display Notification: Using Character Sets to Hide Email Addresses From Harvesters Cathleen Barstow
• Macromedia to aid the disabled online Ruth Stillman
• Using Character Sets to Hide Email Addresses From Harvesters Geoff Deering

Sunday, 2 December 2001

• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses David Woolley
• RE: Label Tags Question Jim Thatcher
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Mike Scott
• RE: Label Tags Question Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Harry Woodrow
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Rowan Smith
• Re: Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Al Gilman

Saturday, 1 December 2001

• RE: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses Joel Sanda
• media:Fw: First IE6 Service Pack Begins Testing David Poehlman
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Jim Thatcher
• Fw: putting reader text in hidden <div> tags / adding pauses David Poehlman
• Fw: Adapting Web Accessibility Guidelines for Australia David Poehlman

Friday, 30 November 2001

• Peepo.com is celebrating its 3rd anniversary on the 21st December. jonathan chetwynd

Thursday, 29 November 2001

• Re: Spacing David Woolley
• Re: Spacing David Woolley
• RE: Spacing Jon Hanna
• Re: Spacing jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Spacing David Poehlman
• Re: Spacing Patrick Burke
• Re: Spacing Patrick Burke
• Re: Spacing David Poehlman
• Re: Spacing Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Spacing David Poehlman
• Re: Spacing David Poehlman
• Spacing Laurie Davis-Covin

Wednesday, 28 November 2001

• Re: WAI IG: Do not open attachment in previous messa joeclark@joeclark.org
• RE: Label Tags Question Jim Thatcher
• RE: Label Tags Question Jon Hanna
• Label Tags Question Lubow Scott
• RE: Nice pictures for you ?! WARNING - CONTAINS VIRUS Mark Magennis
• WAI IG: Do not open attachment in previous message [was: Nice pictures for you ?!] Judy Brewer
• Nice pictures for you ?! Vidas Lauruska

Tuesday, 27 November 2001

• Fwd: Announcing two open source GNOME assistive technologies Harvey Bingham
• Re: Alternate tag of "tabindex", for Netscape Jim Ley
• Re: Alternate tag of "tabindex", for Netscape jonathan chetwynd
• My last email may have had a virus Lisa Seeman

Monday, 26 November 2001

• New Interest Group in Perth Western Australia Harry Woodrow
• Re: braille and languages Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 25 November 2001

• braille and languages Rebecca Cox
• BrainBench Web Accessibility Test No Longer Free Kynn Bartlett

Saturday, 24 November 2001

• Re: Alternate tag of "tabindex", for Netscape Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 23 November 2001

• [Ann] New Website promoting accessible Web design in Scotland Jim Byrne
• RE: Markup RE: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Jon Hanna
• Markup RE: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 22 November 2001

• RE: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Jon Hanna
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Multiple languages in same element. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Multiple languages in same element. Access Systems
• RE: Multiple languages in same element. Jon Hanna
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Multiple languages in same element. Jon Hanna
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Jim Ley
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use David Poehlman
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Jim Ley
• Re: Alternate tag of "tabindex", for Netscape jonathan chetwynd
• RE: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Jim Thatcher

Wednesday, 21 November 2001

• Re: Alternate tag of "tabindex", for Netscape David Woolley
• Re: CSS Visibility & Display David Woolley
• Re: FW: aligning figures in a data table David Woolley
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Alternate tag of "tabindex", for Netscape Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use David Poehlman
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use William R Williams/R5/USDAFS
• Re: Alternate tag of "tabindex", for Netscape William R Williams/R5/USDAFS
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Kynn Bartlett
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use William R Williams/R5/USDAFS
• Alternate tag of "tabindex", for Netscape Viral.Patel@exim.gov
• RE: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Jon Hanna
• Re: abbr/acronym - repetitive use Kynn Bartlett
• abbr/acronym - repetitive use iris
• Re: CSS Visibility & Display Kynn Bartlett
• RE: mark up for complex data tables Access Systems
• FW: aligning figures in a data table Scarlett Julian (ED)
• aligning figures in a data table Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Inconsistencies in WAI guidelines Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: mark up for complex data tables Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout David Woolley
• Re: CSS Visibility & Display David Woolley
• Re: accessibility of tables in downloadable docs David Woolley
• Re: mark up for complex data tables Access Systems
• Emacspeak-15.0 (SmartDog) Unleashed! T. V. Raman

Tuesday, 20 November 2001

• Re: mark up for complex data tables David Woolley
• RE: Digital Talking Book Standards George Kerscher
• accessibility of tables in downloadable docs Anthony Quinn
• RE: CSS Visibility & Display Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: svg onmousewheel? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Digital Talking Book Standards Ruth Stillman
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout Jim Ley
• RE: Headers for tables used for layout Jon Hanna
• Re: Web Accessibility and the Law for businesses David Woolley
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout David Woolley
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout David Woolley
• Re: mark up for complex data tables David Poehlman
• Re: svg onmousewheel? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: mark up for complex data tables Steven McCaffrey
• mark up for complex data tables Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: svg onmousewheel? Jonathan Chetwynd
• NZ Govt Web Guidelines URL Rebecca Cox

Monday, 19 November 2001

• Re: svg onmousewheel? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Headers for tables used for layout Phill Jenkins
• svg onmousewheel? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Web Accessibility and the Law for businesses Snyder, Ethan [JJCUS]
• RE: Headers for tables used for layout Mike Scott
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout Patrick Burke
• RE: Headers for tables used for layout Miraz Jordan
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout David Poehlman
• RE: Headers for tables used for layout Jon Hanna
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. beta now up, does it need a drop-down list as well? Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Headers for tables used for layout Simon White
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout Phill Jenkins
• RE: Headers for tables used for layout Hewitt, Denise
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout David Poehlman
• RE: lights are on, no one's in. beta now up, does it need a drop-down list as well? Jon Hanna
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout William R Williams/R5/USDAFS
• RE: CSS Visibility & Display Mike Scott
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. beta now up, does it need a drop-down list as well? Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Headers for tables used for layout Hewitt, Denise
• RE: Headers for tables used for layout Dana Louise Simberkoff
• Re: Headers for tables used for layout David Poehlman
• Headers for tables used for layout Viral.Patel@exim.gov
• Re: CSS Visibility & Display Jon Gunderson

Sunday, 18 November 2001

• Re: Inconsistencies in WAI guidelines Nick Kew
• Re: Inconsistencies in WAI guidelines David Woolley
• Re: Inconsistencies in WAI guidelines Kynn Bartlett
• Inconsistencies in WAI guidelines Nick Kew

Saturday, 17 November 2001

• request for testers:Fw: [Arkenstone] Bookshare.org Call for Beta Testers David Poehlman

Thursday, 15 November 2001

• Re: CSS Visibility & Display David Woolley
• CSS Visibility & Display Mike Scott

Wednesday, 14 November 2001

• minutes from today Charles McCathieNevile
• Updated Email Address Kynn Bartlett

Tuesday, 13 November 2001

• Re: Linearize This -- Amended William R Williams/R5/USDAFS
• Re: Linearize This William R Williams/R5/USDAFS
• ie5.5 vs ie6.0 vs ie 6.0/xp? David Poehlman
• Re: Linearize This james.homme@highmark.com

Monday, 12 November 2001

• Re: xhtml 1.0, w3c validator, nitpicks David Woolley
• media:WGBH Media Access Site Launched David Poehlman

Tuesday, 13 November 2001

• Re: Linearize This Ineke van der Maat

Monday, 12 November 2001

• Re: xhtml 1.0, w3c validator, nitpicks Kynn Bartlett
• xhtml 1.0, w3c validator, nitpicks jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Linearize This Steven McCaffrey
• Linearize This james.homme@highmark.com
• RE: iCan Founder and CEO Heidi Van Arnem Michael R. Burks

Sunday, 11 November 2001

• Re: iCan Founder and CEO Heidi Van Arnem Kynn Bartlett
• iCan Founder and CEO Heidi Van Arnem Mike Wagner
• Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox "Beyond Accessibility: Treating Users with Disabilities as People" Scott Luebking
• media:Fw: NYTimes.com Article: Cyberclasses in Session David Poehlman
• announcement:Fw: Blind Line Special David Poehlman

Saturday, 10 November 2001

• Web Accessibility mailing list in German Carlos A Velasco
• Announcing two open source GNOME assistive technologies (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 9 November 2001

• Re: current example for Re: Cognitive Disability David Woolley
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? David Poehlman
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Jeff Hiles
• streaming media Fox, Jamie
• Re: current example for Re: Cognitive Disability Miraz Jordan
• Re: Web Accessibility Mailing Lists Charles McCathieNevile
• info:RealPlayer conference coverage of seeing with sound David Poehlman
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Terry Brainerd Chadwick
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? David Woolley
• RE: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Terry Brainerd Chadwick
• RE: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Rebecca Cox
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Leslie K. Yoder

Thursday, 8 November 2001

• Re: current example for Re: Cognitive Disability Joel Ward
• Re: current example for Re: Cognitive Disability Access Systems
• current example for Re: Cognitive Disability Jonathan Chetwynd
• Get to know someone with a cognitive difficulty ! Cognitive Disability Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Penny Harrison - TKI
• RE: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Terry Brainerd Chadwick
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Jon Hanna
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? David Poehlman
• ( Melanie Archer
• Re: Language -- am I being too vigillant? Kynn Bartlett
• Language -- am I being too vigillant? David M. Clark
• Re: WAI vs. General Accessibility Terje Bless
• Re: CC/PP, Usability for PWDs, the Edapta model, and You Jim Ley
• RE: Cognitive Disability Harry Woodrow
• Re: Cognitive Disability Terje Bless
• WAI vs. General Accessibility Al Gilman
• Re: Cognitive Disability Al Gilman
• Re: Cognitive Disability Terje Bless
• Re: Cognitive Disability (was: CC/PP, Usability for PWDs, the Edapta model, and You) Jonathan Chetwynd
• web author seeks feedback? David Poehlman
• Re: Cognitive Disability Al Gilman
• Cognitive Disability (was: CC/PP, Usability for PWDs, the Edapta model, and You) Terje Bless
• CC/PP, Usability for PWDs, the Edapta model, and You Kynn Bartlett
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. Jim Ley
• Re: I think this is the kind of bad site someone was looking for: David Woolley
• Re: I think this is the kind of bad site someone was looking for: David Woolley
• Re: Web Accessibility Mailing Lists Kathleen Anderson
• Re: Web Accessibility Mailing Lists Patrick Burke
• RE: Web Accessibility Mailing Lists Glenda Watson Hyatt
• Re: I think this is the kind of bad site someone was looking for: David Poehlman
• RE: I think this is the kind of bad site someone was looking for: Harry Woodrow
• RE: I think this is the kind of bad site someone was looking for: Access Systems
• RE: I think this is the kind of bad site someone was looking for: Harry Woodrow
• Web Accessibility Mailing Lists Kynn Bartlett
• Re: I think this is the kind of bad site someone was looking for: David Poehlman
• RE: I think this is the kind of bad site someone was looking for: Harry Woodrow
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. Access Systems
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. Kynn Bartlett
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. Access Systems

Wednesday, 7 November 2001

• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• Speaking of Slashdot... Hewitt, Denise
• I think this is the kind of bad site someone was looking for: David Poehlman
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: JAWS doesn't seem to hear Table annotations? David Poehlman
• Re: JAWS doesn't seem to hear Table annotations? Steven McCaffrey
• Re: JAWS doesn't seem to hear Table annotations? David Poehlman
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. Al Gilman
• RE: Take 2 Re: lights are on, no one's in. Jon Hanna
• Take 2 Re: lights are on, no one's in. Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: JAWS doesn't seem to hear Table annotations? Steven McCaffrey
• RE: lights are on, no one's in. Harry Woodrow
• Re: lights are on, no one's in. Jim Ley
• RE: Disability statistics Jim Tobias
• lights are on, no one's in. Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: FW: drop down lists and resizeable text Graham Oliver
• Re: FW: drop down lists and resizeable text Graham Oliver

Tuesday, 6 November 2001

• RE: JAWS doesn't seem to hear Table annotations? Jim Thatcher
• Re: Lotus Notes and Accessibility Graham Oliver
• RE: JAWS doesn't seem to hear Table annotations? Hewitt, Denise
• Re: JAWS doesn't seem to hear Table annotations? Phill Jenkins
• Re: JAWS doesn't seem to hear Table annotations? Patrick Burke
• JAWS doesn't seem to hear Table annotations? Gatewood, Joy
• RE: Lotus Notes and Accessibility Anthony Quinn
• FW: drop down lists and resizeable text Anthony Quinn
• Re: Policy on Web accessibility Al Gilman
• Fw: Re: Lotus Notes and Accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: Policy on Web accessibility Judy Brewer
• Policy on Web accessibility Craig Hadley
• Re: drop down lists and resizeable text Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: drop down lists and resizeable text Frank Rosendahl
• Lotus Notes and Accessibility Simon White
• drop down lists and resizeable text Anthony Quinn
• Re: form fields in table layout Al Gilman
• form fields in table layout Ali (Alejandra) Beatty

Monday, 5 November 2001

• RE: mugshots Charles F. Munat
• Re: "directly accessible" is ? Phill Jenkins
• Re: mugshots David Poehlman
• AW: mugshots Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: "directly accessible" is ? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: mugshots Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: mugshots Kynn Bartlett
• mugshots Rebecca Cox
• A good site? Harry Woodrow

Sunday, 4 November 2001

• Re: Help with configuring Outlook 2000 to communicate with you all Access Systems
• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics David Woolley
• Nielsen/Norman Study: Reviews or Critiques? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Terje Bless
• Online Course: Space Still Available Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Disability statistics Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Disability statistics Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Help with configuring Outlook 2000 to communicate with you al l Denise Wood
• Re: Help with configuring Outlook 2000 to communicate with you all Al Gilman
• Help with configuring Outlook 2000 to communicate with you all Denise Wood
• Re: Tech, Condem, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) David Woolley
• Re: Tech, Condem, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) Leslie K. Yoder

Saturday, 3 November 2001

• RE: Disability statistics Denise Wood
• Disability statistics Joe Clark

Friday, 2 November 2001

• Re: Font sizing; titles on <area> Jonathan Chetwynd
• Font sizing; titles on <area> Joe Clark
• Re: title attribute, another dumb question... David Woolley
• Re: title attribute, another dumb question... Al Gilman
• Re: title attribute, another dumb question... Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: UK Disability Rights Commission Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: title attribute, another dumb question... joeclark@joeclark.org
• Re: Accessibility and learning/cognitive disabilities Demonpenta2@aol.com

Thursday, 1 November 2001

• Re: title attribute, another dumb question... David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility and learning/cognitive disabilities Al Gilman
• title attribute, another dumb question... Jonathan Chetwynd
• UK Disability Rights Commission Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Accessibility and learning/cognitive disabilities George Kerscher
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Access Systems
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Access Systems
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Jim Ley
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Access Systems
• Re: Accessibility and learning/cognitive disabilities David Woolley
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Jim Ley
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Access Systems
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Access Systems
• RE: Style Sheets and Level 2 Conformance james.homme@highmark.com
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Kelly Ford
• Re: Accessibility and learning/cognitive disabilities Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Accessibility and learning/cognitive disabilities Kynn Bartlett
• Accessibility and learning/cognitive disabilities Terry Brainerd Chadwick
• RE: How to complain? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: How to complain? Harry Woodrow
• Re: Style Sheets and Level 2 Conformance Rebecca Cox
• Re: How to complain? Kynn Bartlett
• How to complain? Harry Woodrow
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Access Systems

Wednesday, 31 October 2001

• Re: Style Sheets and Level 2 Conformance David Woolley

Thursday, 1 November 2001

• Re: Style Sheets and Level 2 Conformance Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Style Sheets and Level 2 Conformance Ineke van der Maat

Wednesday, 31 October 2001

• Promoting Accessibility Ball, Guy D
• RE: How to Complain to a Webmaster Ben Canning
• Re: Style Sheets and Level 2 Conformance Terje Bless
• Re: Style Sheets and Level 2 Conformance Phill Jenkins
• RE: How to Complain to a Webmaster Ben Canning
• Style Sheets and Level 2 Conformance james.homme@highmark.com
• Re: How to Complain to a Webmaster Jim Ley
• Re: How to Complain to a Webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• Re: How to Complain to a Webmaster Jim Ley
• Re: [media] Tim Berners-Lee on Microsoft's Latest Browser Tricks Kynn Bartlett
• Re: How to Complain to a Webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• Re: How to Complain to a Webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Inaccessible Web Site: WAI Homepage Paul Davis
• RE: How to Complain to a Webmaster Hewitt, Denise
• Re: How to Complain to a Webmaster Jim Ley
• Re: How to Complain to a Webmaster David Woolley
• Re: [media] Tim Berners-Lee on Microsoft's Latest Browser Tricks David Woolley
• Inaccessible Web Site: WAI Homepage Kynn Bartlett
• RE: How to Complain to a Webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• Re: How to Complain to a Webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• RE: How to Complain to a Webmaster Ben Canning
• RE: How to Complain to a Webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• FW: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Paul Davis
• Re: How to Complain to a Webmaster Jim Ley
• RE: How to Complain to a Webmaster Ben Canning
• RE: How to Complain to a Webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• RE: How to Complain to a Webmaster Ben Canning
• How to Complain to a Webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Not Re: How not to get a good reaction from a webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• Not Re: How not to get a good reaction from a webmaster Joe Clark
• Re: How not to get a good reaction from a webmaster David Poehlman
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Kelly Ford
• RE: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Paul Davis
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign David Woolley
• How not to get a good reaction from a webmaster Kynn Bartlett

Tuesday, 30 October 2001

• [media] Tim Berners-Lee on Microsoft's Latest Browser Tricks Kathleen Anderson
• Re: Why I posted the SLC response David Poehlman
• Re: Why I posted the SLC response Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign claude sweet
• Mostly Just Gross Overreactions :-) [ was: Criminal Negligence, Making Enemies, and Gross Overreactions ] Terje Bless
• Re: Screen readers Phillip Pi
• Re: Screen readers David Poehlman
• RE: Screen readers Harry Woodrow
• RE: Screen readers Phillip Pi
• RE: Screen readers Kynn Bartlett
• RE: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Phillip Pi
• RE: Screen readers Harry Woodrow
• Emacspeak Kynn Bartlett
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Kynn Bartlett
• RE: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Harry Woodrow
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Phillip Pi
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Phillip Pi
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Kynn Bartlett
• The Salt Lake 2002 Webmaster Kynn Bartlett
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Patrick Burke
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible Phillip Pi
• Tom Worthington and SLC2002 Joe Clark
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible joeclark@joeclark.org
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Phillip Pi
• Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Joe Clark
• RE: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Access Systems
• Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Access Systems
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Hewitt, Denise
• RE: ASCII Ribbon Campaign Greg Kihlstrom
• ASCII Ribbon Campaign Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Criminal Negligence, Making Enemies, and Gross Overreactions Kynn Bartlett
• Criminal Negligence (was: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site) Terje Bless
• RE: Tech, Condemn, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) Access Systems
• RE: Tech, Condem, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) Harry Woodrow
• RE: Tech, Condemn, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) Paul Davis
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Phillip Pi
• RE: Tech, Condem, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) Access Systems
• RE: Tech, Condem, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) Paul Davis
• RE: What the Salt Lake City guy really said Access Systems
• Re: What the Salt Lake City guy really said tina@elfi.org
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Denise Wood
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Harry Woodrow
• Re: Tech, Condem, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake ' 02 Web master: Inaccessible site) tina@elfi.org
• RE: What the Salt Lake City guy really said Michael R. Burks
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Kynn Bartlett
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Kynn Bartlett
• What the Salt Lake City guy really said Kynn Bartlett
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Tech, Condem, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Tech, Condem, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) Access Systems
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Hewitt, Denise
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Michael R. Burks
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site David Woolley
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site David Woolley
• RE: Why I posted the SLC response Paul Davis
• Why I posted the SLC response Debi Orton
• Tech, Condem, and Inform (Was: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Web master: Inaccessible site) tina@elfi.org
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Harry Woodrow
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Paul Davis
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Paul Davis
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site David Woolley
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Hewitt, Denise
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Kynn Bartlett
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Michael R. Burks
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Michael R. Burks
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Access Systems
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Denise Wood
• Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Demonpenta2@aol.com
• OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site Debi Orton
• Web Accessibility Expert Available :) Kynn Bartlett

Monday, 29 October 2001

• Re: on the adobe issue Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: MSN web site inaccessible to competing browsers Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Stipulating fonts or not to stipulate. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Stipulating fonts or not to stipulate. Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Stipulating fonts or not to stipulate. David Poehlman
• RE: Stipulating fonts or not to stipulate. Harry Woodrow
• Stipulating fonts or not to stipulate. Paul Davis
• Re: title for empty frames David Woolley
• Re: "directly accessible" is ? David Woolley
• MSN, browsers, Web Standards Project Joe Clark
• RE: title for empty frames Kelly Ford
• Re: OT - Using the Web Based Interface to respond to list postings Al Gilman
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Phillip Pi
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Access Systems
• OT - Using the Web Based Interface to respond to list postings Graham Oliver
• RE: title for empty frames Jim Thatcher
• RE: title for empty frames Al Gilman
• "directly accessible" is ? Rebecca Cox
• RE: title for empty frames Rebecca Cox
• Re: MSN web site inaccessible to competing browsers Kynn Bartlett
• RE: title for empty frames Jim Thatcher

Sunday, 28 October 2001

• MSN: It does seem that we rather jumped the gun, and this may have been a glitch. was Re: MSN web site inaccessible to competing browsers Jonathan Chetwynd
• title for empty frames Rebecca Cox
• MSN web site inaccessible to competing browsers Joe Clark
• MSN web site inaccessible to competing browsers David Woolley
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Michael R. Burks
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site joeclark@joeclark.org
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Less shame, more action Kynn Bartlett

Saturday, 27 October 2001

• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Phillip Pi
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Paul Davis
• Re: Less shame, more action Jonathan Chetwynd
• Less shame, more action Joe Clark
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Michael R. Burks
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Michael R. Burks
• Re: Server-side image maps David Woolley
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Denise Wood
• Re: Server-side image maps Kynn Bartlett
• Re: default style sheets Kynn Bartlett
• Re: default style sheets Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Kynn Bartlett
• Server-side image maps Jim Thatcher
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Denise Wood
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Michael R. Burks
• RE: Conformance confusion Denise Wood
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Denise Wood
• Re: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site David Woolley
• Re: Conformance confusion David Woolley
• Re: on the adobe issue David Woolley
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Denise Wood
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Michael R. Burks
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Phillip Pi
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Michael R. Burks
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Phillip Pi
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Denise Wood
• Re: default style sheets Phillip Pi
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Access Systems
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Denise Wood
• Re: default style sheets Josh Yotty
• Re: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Access Systems

Friday, 26 October 2001

• Re: on the adobe issue Charles McCathieNevile
• Conformance confusion Joe Clark
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Phillip Pi
• Re: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Jim Ley
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Michael R. Burks
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Danny Ayers
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Michael R. Burks
• RE: MSN.com Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Denise Wood
• Re: on the adobe issue David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Steven McCaffrey
• RE: PDFs Graham Oliver
• Accessibility of Salt Lake Olympic Site Michael R. Burks
• RE: PDFs Denise Wood
• on the adobe issue John Morse
• RE: PDFs Denise Wood
• Auto-replies Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: default style sheets Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: PDFs David Poehlman
• RE: PDFs John Morse

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Re: default style sheets Marti McCuller
• Re: default style sheets Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: default style sheets Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: default style sheets Peach Lynda L Contr 96 CG/SCTOA
• Re: default style sheets Access Systems
• default style sheets Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: a question of scripts (this time completed) Denise Wood

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• tone: mocking the afflicted Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: a question of scripts (this time completed) Jon Hanna
• Illustration Joe Clark
• RE: a question of scripts (this time completed) Denise Wood
• RE: a question of scripts (this time completed) Harry Woodrow
• RE: PDFs Denise Wood
• RE: a question of scripts (this time completed) Denise Wood

Tuesday, 23 October 2001

• Re: MS Office and Accessibility David Woolley
• AW: Nielson Norman Group Accessibility was: Re: 170147_1.html (fwd) Jan Eric Hellbusch
• Re: re:a question of scripts (this time completed) Phill Jenkins
• Re: PDFs Access Systems
• Re: a question of scripts (this time completed) David Woolley
• Re: PDFs David Poehlman
• PDFs Joe Clark
• Re: Neilsen Norman Group Accessibility Study - Was Re: 170147_1.h tml (fwd) Access Systems
• RE: Neilsen Norman Group Accessibility Study - Was Re: 170147_1.html (fwd) Steven McCaffrey
• Re: Neilsen Norman Group Accessibility Study - Was Re: 170147_1.h tml (fwd) David Poehlman
• RE: Neilsen Norman Group Accessibility Study - Was Re: 170147_1.h tml (fwd) Denise Wood
• RE: a question of scripts (this time completed) Denise Wood
• RE: a question of scripts (this time completed) Jim Thatcher
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Denise Wood
• Accessibility Standards for Wireless Technology Jo Donkin
• Re: Nielson Norman Group Accessibility was: Re: 170147_1.html (fwd) David Poehlman
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Jim Thatcher
• Nielson Norman Group Accessibility was: Re: 170147_1.html (fwd) Jan Hellbusch
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Jean-Marie D'Amour
• Re: Neilsen Norman Group Accessibility Study - Was Re: 170147_1.html (fwd) Access Systems
• Re: re:a question of scripts (this time completed) Jim Ley
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Kelly Ford
• Neilsen Norman Group Accessibility Study - Was Re: 170147_1.html (fwd) Steven McCaffrey
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Access Systems
• Re: re:a question of scripts (this time completed) Jim Ley
• re:a question of scripts (this time completed) John Morse
• a question of scripts John Morse
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Neilsen Norman Group Accessibility Study - Was Re: 170147_1.html (fwd) Graham Oliver
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility David Woolley
• RE: Section 508 Asif
• RE: Section 508 Asif
• RE: Section 508 Asif
• RE: Section 508 Asif
• 170147_1.html (fwd) Access Systems
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Terry Brainerd Chadwick

Monday, 22 October 2001

• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: Section 508 Denise Wood
• RE: Section 508 Patrick Burke
• Re: Section 508 Phill Jenkins
• RE: Section 508 Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Section 508 Denise Wood
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Denise Wood
• Re: MS Office and Accessibility David Poehlman
• RE: MS Office and Accessibility Denise Wood
• RE: browsers and xhtml John Morse
• Re: MS Office and Accessibility David Poehlman
• re: MS Office and Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Section 508 Joe Clark
• re: MS Office and Accessibility Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: MS Office and accessibility David Woolley
• Re: MS Office and accessibility Phill Jenkins
• Re: MS Office and accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Simon Evans
• Re: MS Office and accessibility Jim Ley
• Re: MS Office and accessibility Kelly Ford
• RE: MS Office and accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: MS Office and accessibility Harry Woodrow
• Re: MS Office and accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Section 508 Harry Woodrow
• MS Office and accessibility Scarlett Julian (ED)

Sunday, 21 October 2001

• RE: Inclusion or accessibility Denise Wood
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Section 508 David Poehlman
• RE: Section 508 Asif
• Re: Section 508 David Woolley
• RE: Section 508 Denise Wood
• Australian Accessibility was Re:Section 508 Harry Woodrow
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Jim Ley
• Re: Section 508 Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: Section 508 Denise Wood

Saturday, 20 October 2001

• RE: Section 508 Cynthia Waddell
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Simon Evans
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Al Gilman
• AccessIT Harvey Bingham
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Simon Evans
• RE: Section 508 Denise Wood
• Re: Section 508 Al Gilman
• Re: Section 508 Kynn Bartlett

Friday, 19 October 2001

• RE: Section 508 Michael R. Burks
• Re: Section 508 Access Systems
• Section 508 Asif
• ABBR/ACRONYM and the lang attribute Jouni Heikniemi
• Re: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation David Poehlman
• Re: Slashdot adopts images as category generalisation. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility David Poehlman

Thursday, 18 October 2001

• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Simon Evans
• Re: Slashdot adopts images as category generalisation. Graham Oliver
• Re: Slashdot adopts images as category generalisation. Phill Jenkins
• Slashdot adopts images as category generalisation. Jonathan Chetwynd

Wednesday, 17 October 2001

• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Looking for link (fwd) Joe Clark
• RE: Inclusion or accessibility Al Gilman
• RE: Inclusion or accessibility Mark Magennis
• RE: Inclusion or accessibility Al Gilman
• announcement:Fw: 2 online courses on accessible web design by EASI Oct. 29---- David Poehlman
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Jim Ley
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility David Poehlman
• RE: Inclusion or accessibility Mark Magennis
• RE: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation Jon Hanna
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Sean B. Palmer

Tuesday, 16 October 2001

• Re: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation David Woolley
• Re: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation David Woolley
• Re: Inclusion or accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Links to external content maintaining navigation Jim Ley
• Inclusion or accessibility Jonathan Chetwynd
• Media - Voice Recognition Graham Oliver
• RE: Help re accessible credit card page Mac McCuller
• Re: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation Jonathan Chetwynd
• Help re accessible credit card page EASI
• Re: Links to external content maintaining navigation Joe Clark
• New November Online Course in Web Accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• Re: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation Terry Brainerd Chadwick
• Re: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation Patrick Burke
• Re: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation Michelle Podd
• Re: links to external conten t- maintaining navigation Terry Brainerd Chadwick
• links to external conten t- maintaining navigation Michelle Podd
• [media] Give HTML A Say - InformationWeek Daily Kathleen Anderson

Monday, 15 October 2001

• Re: Bandwidth Still is a Real Issue David Poehlman
• Re: Bandwidth Still is a Real Issue Jim Ley

Sunday, 14 October 2001

• Re: Dynamic pages was: SENIT The Ngfl website Jonathan Chetwynd
• Dynamic pages was: SENIT The Ngfl website Jonathan Chetwynd

Saturday, 13 October 2001

• Bandwidth Still is a Real Issue David Woolley

Friday, 12 October 2001

• Call for review: Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility Judy Brewer

Wednesday, 10 October 2001

• Re: JAWS Questions james.homme@highmark.com
• JAWS Questions for Screen Reader Users james.homme@highmark.com
• Re: What instead of click here? David Poehlman
• RE: What instead of click here? Simon White
• Re: What instead of click here? David Woolley

Tuesday, 9 October 2001

• Re: What instead of click here? Jim Ley
• Re: What instead of click here? David Poehlman
• RE: What instead of click here? Danny Ayers
• Re: What instead of click here? David Woolley
• Re: What instead of click here? David Poehlman
• Re: What instead of click here? David Woolley
• Re: What instead of click here? Jim Ley
• Re: What instead of click here? David Poehlman
• RE: What instead of click here? Simon White
• RE: What instead of click here? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: What instead of click here? Hewitt, Denise
• Re: What instead of click here? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: What instead of click here? David Poehlman
• Re: What instead of click here? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Jim Ley
• Re: [w3c-wai-ig] <none> David Poehlman
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Jim Ley
• Re: mac and accessibility - slightly ot Claudio
• Re: What instead of click here? David Poehlman
• Re: What instead of click here? David Poehlman
• Re: What instead of click here? Jim Ley
• Re: What instead of click here? David Poehlman
• Re: What instead of click here? David Poehlman
• Re: What instead of click here? Jim Ley
• What instead of click here? Simon White

Monday, 8 October 2001

• Re: CheckPoint 3.2 Charles McCathieNevile
• Corporate Style Guides Patrick Burke
• SVG in IHT (itech) Jonathan Chetwynd
• Online Accessibility Course in November: Any Interest? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Mac accessibility Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 7 October 2001

• Re: Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers Jim Ley
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Jim Ley
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Jim Ley
• Re: Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers David Poehlman
• Re: Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Which popular Web search engines are used among people with disabilities? Access Systems
• Nielsen Team Weighs In For Accessibility Patrick Burke

Saturday, 6 October 2001

• Re: Which popular Web search engines are used among people with disabilities? Kathleen Anderson
• Re: Which popular Web search engines are used among people with disabilities? Access Systems
• Re: Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers David Poehlman
• Re: Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers Jim Ley
• Re: Which popular Web search engines are used among people with disabilities? Kathleen Anderson
• Re: Which popular Web search engines are used among people with disabilities? Access Systems
• Re: Which popular Web search engines are used among people with disabilities? Phillip Pi
• Re: Which popular Web search engines are used among people with disabilities? Patrick Burke
• Re: Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers Kynn Bartlett
• Which popular Web search engines are used among people with disabilities? Phillip Pi
• Re: Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers David Poehlman
• Mac accessibility Joe Clark
• Navigation to Alternate HTML for Screen Readers Joe Clark

Friday, 5 October 2001

• Re: Importance of Narrative (Was article: The beauty of single columned sequential text") David Poehlman
• RE: Importance of Narrative (Was article: The beauty of single columned sequential text") Danny Ayers
• Re: Screen readers and full stops + seperating links! David Poehlman
• RE: Screen readers and full stops + seperating links! Phill Jenkins
• Re: mac and accessibility - slightly ot Jim Ley
• Re: mac and accessibility - slightly ot Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: mac and accessibility - slightly ot Kynn Bartlett
• Re: mac and accessibility - slightly ot Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: mac and accessibility - slightly ot Jo Miller
• Importance of Narrative (Was article: The beauty of single columned sequential text") karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov
• Re: mac and accessibility - slightly ot Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: mac and accessibility - slightly ot Kynn Bartlett
• Re: article: The beauty of single columned sequential text" David Poehlman
• RE: article: The beauty of single columned sequential text" Danny Ayers
• mac and accessibility - slightly ot Anthony Quinn
• position available: David Poehlman
• Call for review: Business Benefits of Accessible Web Design Judy Brewer

Thursday, 4 October 2001

• CheckPoint 3.2 Craig Hadley
• article: The beauty of single columned sequential text" David Poehlman
• meanwhile was Re: have we made some recommendation to the HTML working group? was Re: ie6, tabbing and website navigation design Jonathan Chetwynd
• alternatively was Re: have we made some recommendation to the HTML working group? was Re: ie6, tabbing and website navigation design Jonathan Chetwynd
• have we made some recommendation to the HTML working group? was Re: ie6, tabbing and website navigation design Jonathan Chetwynd
• elements, attributes and tags David Poehlman
• Re: Screen readers and full stops + seperating links! David Poehlman
• Re: ie6, tabbing and website navigation design Judy Brewer
• Re: Screen readers and full stops + seperating links! Marti McCuller
• Re: Screen readers and full stops + seperating links! David Poehlman
• RE: Screen readers and full stops + seperating links! Rebecca Cox

Tuesday, 2 October 2001

• Re: ie6, tabbing and website navigation design Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Drop Down Menu Accessibility Jim Ley
• Re: Why JavaScript at all? Jim Ley
• Re: ie6, tabbing and website navigation design Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: ie6, tabbing and website navigation design Graham Oliver

Last message date: Monday, 31 December 2001 15:36:47 UTC