- From: Kelly Ford <Kelly@kellford.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 01:30:57 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 01:37 PM 10/30/01 -0500, Access Systems wrote: >On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Kynn Bartlett wrote: > > > At 09:25 AM 10/30/2001 , Access Systems wrote: > > > /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign accessBob .-. > > > \ / NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail accessys@smartnospam.net /v\ > > > X NO MSWord docs in e-mail Access Systems, > engineers // \\ > > > / \ NO attachments in e-mail equal access is a civil right /( > _ )\ > > >*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* > #*#*#* > > > > You know, ASCII art is considered an accessibility barrier. > >text interpertation next to it, "ASCII RIBBON" >and the other one isn't supposed to be intereperted, if you know what it >means it means the same in non visual and you understand it So how am I supposed to know from hearing star number a dozen or more times what's going on. Quite honestly ASCII art is every bit as much as an accessibility problem as the other items I read here all the time. In this example I see nothing telling me what's coming up and am slammed in the ears with an incessent repetition of "star number". And what's all the slash back slash around the signiture? More audio clutter to me.
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 04:28:28 UTC