- From: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:08:25 +0800
- To: <Demonpenta2@aol.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <LDEMKFBKJGCANBEJGEOIKEMDCBAA.harrry@email.com>
I think it may well be that it may be hard to make a business case for accessibility if we say that you can access people with disabilities as then it makes people feel we are only accessing a limitted range of people. Many businesses survive with the profit they from the bulk of the population which covers al the operating and general design costs for the sites. An accessible site however is all cream after the very minor extra cost of making it accessible is taken into account, all of the extra customers they get from the disabled population increase their profit, can many afford to throw away 10 or more percent of customers? Harry Woodrow -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Demonpenta2@aol.com Sent: Sunday, 16 December 2001 4:40 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Disability statistics In a message dated 12/16/01 3:35:13 AM Eastern Standard Time, kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com writes: It's not profitable to be accessible, really. The markets aren't necessarily worth reaching, at least not currently. The better arguments are "you'll look like big jerks" or "your CEO won't be able to sleep at night". Those are 100% more effective than "you'll make lots of cash by selling to disabled folks." Problem is, I don't think people these days would CARE enough to consider the offending companies jerks...And I doubt many CEOs would find their sleep very disturbed. John
Received on Sunday, 16 December 2001 06:17:30 UTC