Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities

> > Lynx support for major web standards is lagging far behind where it
> > could be.  Lynx is roughly at the stage of, say, Netscape 2 or so.
> 
> I guess that is a matter of opinion, it is pretty good at what it does and
> while I have a later version of netscape, I so rarely run it because I so
> like what LYNX does so much better.   especially it is "Clean and Fast"
> 
> so far I have yet to find a browser that is better there.  not to mention
> that access is almost a "gimmi" 

I like Lynx and Links because I want just quick information. I don't need
graphics and want to wait (if I am on a dial-up connection). I agree that 
it is quick and fast. I only care about information. Graphics are nice 
only if I need them.

Received on Tuesday, 25 December 2001 17:32:41 UTC