- From: Phillip Pi <philpi@apu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 14:32:39 -0800 (PST)
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> > Lynx support for major web standards is lagging far behind where it > > could be. Lynx is roughly at the stage of, say, Netscape 2 or so. > > I guess that is a matter of opinion, it is pretty good at what it does and > while I have a later version of netscape, I so rarely run it because I so > like what LYNX does so much better. especially it is "Clean and Fast" > > so far I have yet to find a browser that is better there. not to mention > that access is almost a "gimmi" I like Lynx and Links because I want just quick information. I don't need graphics and want to wait (if I am on a dial-up connection). I agree that it is quick and fast. I only care about information. Graphics are nice only if I need them.
Received on Tuesday, 25 December 2001 17:32:41 UTC