- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 08:55:48 -0400
- To: "Mark Magennis" <mark@frontend.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I do not disagree with the discussion at all but would like to add to it that the crafters of wai products seem to me to be well aware of this issue and are creating products that if marketed and used correctly perhaps *inclusively* will benefit more than it seems. The passages below are taken from the introduction to the web content accessibility guidelines version 1.0, and exemplify more than what we think of as the *disabled*. There is a danger as we have seen in the past to allow these issues which are an umbrella in ad of themselves to be further umbrellad hence even more likely to be neglected. When I am combatted with questions springing usually from an attitude of dismissal due to lack of knowledge or over an incorrect premise, I provide the below info which usually gains results. --- begin quoted portion: For those unfamiliar with accessibility issues pertaining to Web page design, consider that many users may be operating in contexts very different from your own: * They may not be able to see, hear, move, or may not be able to process some types of information easily or at all. * They may have difficulty reading or comprehending text. * They may not have or be able to use a keyboard or mouse. * They may have a text-only screen, a small screen, or a slow Internet connection. * They may not speak or understand fluently the language in which the document is written. * They may be in a situation where their eyes, ears, or hands are busy or interfered with (e.g., driving to work, working in a loud environment, etc.). * They may have an early version of a browser, a different browser entirely, a voice browser, or a different operating system. --- end quoted portion: As you can see, there ar a lot of environmental issues addressed in this tight little paragraph which appears at the top of the introduction and in the user agent accessibility guidelines as well as others. As has been mentioned before, no matter what label you put on it, as soon as it is understood what the label describes the label means the same thing as the label before it. The guidelines were labeled before they were concieved I think and the label was changed at some point. They go though if they are read carefully, far beyond that label.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 08:55:43 UTC