- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 10:52:12 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
By the way, if we really ARE going to start down the road of "someone proposes a web site, and we all discuss the inaccessibility of it", can we start with the Web Accessibility Initiative homepage at http://www.w3.org/WAI/? I and others have mentioned multiple times the fact that this web site is completely unillustrated, and in fact, in my seminars I use WAI homepage as an example of an inaccessible page. (I also use WCAG as an example of failure to use "clear and simple language.") WAI staff have repeatedly refused to even put a picture of a disabled person on the WAI site -- so my question to the rest of you who advocate public activism on this issue would be, "What do I do next?" Should I be writing letters to Slashdot or Wired or CNN or the New York Times decrying their hypocrisy and refusal to meet my demands? I'm not just making a rhetorical point here -- I really do think there is a huge accessibility problem on the WAI site. I'd just like to find out how you think this should be handled. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://idyllmtn.com/ Online Instructor, Accessible Web Design http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 13:55:03 UTC