>I'm continually ashamed of myself. My web page is all text, for >example, and whenever I read something by Jonathan or Anne, I feel >guilt and shame, and my reflex is to utterly reject whatever they >say because it makes me feel bad. Oh, stop. Accessibility is a process of continuous education. The requirements of people who don't read well are merely the newest news. It takes a while to come up with an accessibility approach, which, in this particular case, may be antithetical to the Web as we know it by definition anyway. It then takes even longer to apply that approach, if it even can be. There is no reason for "shame" here. It's all a bit self-indulgent, and, moreover, comes off as quite false. Let's not turn the accessibility demimonde into a twelve-step group or a forum for venting of private emotional complexes, like the televised recollections of some starlet just out of rehab. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org | <http://joeclark.org/access/> Accessibility articles, resources, and critiques || "I do not pretend to understand the mind of Joe Clark" -- Larry GoldbergReceived on Saturday, 27 October 2001 17:06:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:15 UTC