- From: Carol Foster <c.foster@umassp.edu>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:09:34 -0500
- To: Access Systems <accessys@smart.net>
- CC: William R Williams/R5/USDAFS <wrwilliams@fs.fed.us>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
You can try out a test one that I created for practice at http://www.umassp.edu:4670/uis/ipg/accessibility/coursework/testpdf.pdf I doubt lynx will be able to do anything with it though! I could read it with JAWS. Let me know what happens. Access Systems wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Carol Foster wrote: > > > I agree with Jakob Nielsen, though some people really like PDF's. I tend to > > get annoyed when I click on a link and a PDF suddenly starts slowly appearing > > without warning. > > know any sites where I can try it, I have yet to meet a pdf that I can > view? > > Bob > > > > > I believe to meet WAI priority 1 checkpoints, an HTML version is required. The > > new more accessible PDF's that can be created with Adobe 5.0 and the Make > > Accessible Plugin are definitely an improvement over the old ones for screen > > readers, and if I understand this correctly, I believe that they alone will > > satisfy Section 508 without an alternative, though an HTML version is still > > recommended. > > > > As a web developer, I'm afraid that those of us who want to make our sites as > > accessible as possible are now in the position of not only having to create an > > HTML version, which can be easy or very time consuming (depending on what we > > have to start with), but also to make sure the PDF is itself accessible, which > > can also be easy or very time consuming, depending on how the PDF was created, > > what hardware and software one has, and how well one knows the new PDF tagging > > language and update facilities. > > > > Carol > > > > William R Williams/R5/USDAFS wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > It's been debated often, I suspect; yet, if my experience means anything, > > > much disagreement exists about the "true" accessibility of pdfs on the web. > > > Certainly, Adobe has promoted the application and worked diligently to make > > > them accessible, but others - such as Jakob Nielsen - suggest avoiding pdfs > > > for on-screen delivery. > > > > > > I know there are definite usability issues, but how does this group stand > > > on the accessibility of PDFs? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > ====================== > > > Bill Williams > > > Communication Technician > > > USDA Forest Service, Region 5 > > > 707.562.9005 > > > wrwilliams@fs.fed.us > > > ====================== > > > > Carol Foster, Web Developer > > University of Massachusetts, President's Office > > http://www.umass-its.net/ipg > > > > ASCII Ribbon Campaign accessBob > NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail accessys@smartnospam.net > NO MSWord docs in e-mail Access Systems, engineers > NO attachments in e-mail, *LINUX powered* access is a civil right > *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# > THIS message and any attachements are CONFIDENTIAL and may be > privledged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named > above. If you are not the intended recipient, Please notify the sender as > soon as possible. Please DO NOT READ, COPY, USE, or DISCLOSE this > communication to others and DELETE it from your computer systems. Thanks -- Carol Foster, Web Developer Internet Publishing Group, Information Technology Services University of Massachusetts, President's Office (413) 587-2130 mailto:c.foster@umassp.edu http://www.umass-its.net/ipg --
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2001 17:07:55 UTC