- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 09:36:00 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Simon Evans <simon@senteacher.org>
- cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
As one of the posters, I don't have a lot of exemplars in mind as regards universal accessibility. I hope I have most of the problems in mind, but could use more feedback on solutions that can be used. For example, I am aware that there are people who find multimedia makes the difference between comprehension and nothing, but I do not believe (and have not seen it written) that "any multimedia" will do. So I am wondering what features it is that make the difference - lots of motion, colour, sound, no animation, ??? There is a big list, and it may be that there are different features that work in different circumstances. But finding a workable solution depends on knowing these variables as a start. cheers Charles McCN On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Simon Evans wrote: I teach IT to teens with SLD/PMLD and SLD Autism...also work as an IT teacher trainer within special needs and IT. Recently I've been working on a couple of inclusive sites for kids with the above (profound) cognitive disabilities and this is my particular area of interest within accessibility issues. I've found most of the posts here seem quite wide of the mark for my clients....whilst the fundamentals of guidelines would appear to acknowledge their difficulties, there are almost no relevant specifics at W3. Given the time I've spent looking for inclusive sites without finding more than a couple, I'm wondering what posters have in mind as exemplars for 'universal accessibility'. Simon -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2001 09:36:02 UTC