- From: William R Williams/R5/USDAFS <wrwilliams@fs.fed.us>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:01:46 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I believe reality enters into the equation. For example, it is accepted practice in the publishing industry to, upon first use only, associate an acronym/abbreviation with its entire title and expect the reader to recall this association in later uses of the acro/abbr. In other words, 1 full articulation is provided but, thereafter, the acro/abbr is presented alone -- such usage only makes sense, or else, why does an acronym or abbreviation exist in the first place? In this fashion, individuals who are temporarily enabled are expected to remember the meaning of the acro/abbr and so it should be, as well, for individuals experiencing relevant disabilities. Web presentation does not really change this logic; in fact, repeated use of the acronym/abbreviation tags at each instance seems discriminatory in itself. Certainly, the design of the web site is also a consideration. A good example is a case where one links, or anchors, to a section of a web page where the acro/abbr is used, but the complete articulation is provided in an earlier passage on that page. There is probably a need here to repeat the acro/abbr tag. Bill Williams iris <iristopa@excit To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org e.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: abbr/acronym - repetitive use w3c-wai-ig-requ est@w3.org 11/21/01 08:45 AM Please respond to iristopa hi everyone background: i convert a lot of academic research reports and similar documents into html, which contain tons of abbreviations and acronyms, many of which occur repeatedly on the same page. request for advice/opinion: would it be enough to enclose the first occurrence of an acronym in the appropriate tag, e.g. <acronym title="Manchester Metropolitan University">MMU</acronym> and leave the other occurrences of MMU on the same page without the mark-up, or is it best to do this for every time the acronym occurs. additional question: and while we're on the subject, there seems to be confusion over which is which. my understanding is that an acronym is something like WWW, where the first letter of each word is used, while a shortening of a word (e.g. etc. from etcetera) is an abbreviation. but even the wai guidelines have WWW listed as an abbreviation. ??? thanks iris _____________________ omnia mea mecum porto biz:http://www.jarmin.com/ fun:http://www.transtribal.org/ _______________________________ _______________________________________________________ http://inbox.excite.com
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 15:57:32 UTC