- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 10:47:19 -0800
- To: "Ben Canning" <bencan@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 10:33 AM 10/31/2001 , Ben Canning wrote: >I'm not sure if you're arguing against my position or for it. To be >clear, I'm not arguing for trying to educate individual designers. We >need to target both the design community and the people who are paying >for the sites, and I think a good way to do that is by discussing >publicly (e.g. in the press) sites that don't meet the bar. I agree with >Kynn that we need to do this in a helpful and constructive way, but we >need to do it. Can you provide an example of this, please? I've provided my own example of how I believe we should approach this problem -- respectful dialogue with web developers. Can you provide an example of the type of message you would write -- say, a press release (given your "e.g. in the press" comment) -- that is helpful and constructive in discussing an inaccessible web site? Feel free to use a hypothetical "example.com" web site if you can't find any other examples handy. Thanks, I look forward to it. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 13:49:24 UTC