- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:33:49 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> <object type="image/svg+xml" data="someSVGimage"> > <img src="plainPng" alt="examples can be dull" /> > <object> Strictly this should be: <object type="image/svg+xml" data="someSVGimage"> <object type="image/png" data="plainPng"> examples can be dull </object> <object> however, the implementation of object is so poor, after all it has been in the standard for only 4 years now, that the first one is safer. As hinted at in Jon's question on www-svg, people are actually advised to use the, proprietory, element "embed" for SVG, because of the poor object implementations.
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2001 17:13:36 UTC