- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:12:19 -0500
- To: "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
this is all things web accessibility. I suggest this be taken to a different ground. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:30 PM Subject: RE: Fwd from CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Hi, A number of things I'm involved with are outside of the disabled world which exposes me to a variety of views. So, let me ask some hard questions about universal design. 1. Does universal design mean that the experience of one person has to be limited so that another person can have a similar experience, e.g. a slick, flashy design? 2. If there is a technique which some people can use to speed up their use of information, but other people can't use and will be slower at processing information, should the technique not be used? What if there is no other equivalent technique that increases the speed that a person can use the information? 3. Does a person using access technology have the same experience as someone not using access technology even if they are referencing the same web page? Just a few thoughts. Scott > Design for all, Universal Design, now we begin to see relevance of these > terms. > > Sincerely, > > Mike Burks
Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 13:12:06 UTC