- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 10:02:55 -0800
- To: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 11:27 AM +0000 12/25/01, Vadim Plessky wrote:
>| Lemme say that again since it rarely gets said:
>| LAYOUT TABLES DO NOT PRESENT ANY MORE OR LESS A BARRIER TO
>| ACCESS THAN DOES CSS.
>BTW: I don't understand why you try to treat Tables separatly from CSS.
>yoy can define
>a { display: table }
>b { display: table-row }
>c { display: table-cell }
How many assistive technologies will understand the above, and
how many will understand <table> tags? :)
But as you say, <table> tags are just arbitrary elements with
CSS table styling pre-applied. If using tables for layout is evil,
then surely so is the above, which is CSS! You can do just as much
evil with CSS as with <table>, and -- see my other message for a
discussion as to why generic tags like <div> are less useful than
double-use tags like <table>.
--Kynn
--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com
Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume
January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Tuesday, 25 December 2001 13:27:02 UTC