- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 18:44:38 -0800
- To: Tina Marie Holmboe <tina@elfi.elfi.org>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 8:24 PM +0100 12/25/01, Tina Marie Holmboe wrote: > I do hope your gripe with Lynx isn't the fact that it doesn't support 100% > of the "dancing clown" syndrome; I have yet to see *any* browser which > fully support *every W3C standard* - including Lynx. I have a "gripe" with Lynx? No, I'm merely pointing out that it's limited in what it supports and what it doesn't, and it shouldn't be considered a full web browser by the standards of 2001-2002. Whether or not other browsers support "every W3C standard" is immaterial; if Lynx doesn't and something else doesn't, that means they are both behind the times -- it doesn't magically make Lynx standards- compliant. By the way, I use Lynx a lot, but not as much as I could, because it is _so_ limited in what it does. Are you saying it _does_ do CSS, DOM, JavaScript, and the other things I listed? Nothing on the pages cited indicates that. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Tuesday, 25 December 2001 22:12:20 UTC