Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities

On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Vadim Plessky wrote:

> On Wednesday 26 December 2001 01:45, Access Systems wrote:
> |   On Tue, 25 Dec 2001, David Poehlman wrote:
> |   > it's not considered a virtue.  It has been discovered that since lynx
> |   I guess it depends on what is desired, nothing wrong with a static
> |   browser.
> |     I have used Lynx for many years and each versions gets better and it
> 
> Give Konqueror a try.

I have Konqueror, although I haven't used it much

> If you have fast Internet access, I can recommend you just download latest 

mid fast access, since I am using a dial up at 56K

> release of Linux-Mandrake (LM) or SuSE and install it (it's available for 
> FREE). 

I am currently running Red Hat 7.1 but have Debian and Caldera also

Bob

   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob                       
    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net       
    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers       
    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right 
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachements are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privledged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, Please notify the sender as
soon as possible. Please DO NOT READ, COPY, USE, or DISCLOSE this
communication to others and DELETE it from your computer systems.  Thanks

Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2001 17:31:48 UTC