- From: Jan Eric Hellbusch <hellbusch@web.de>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 21:41:25 +0200
- To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@home.com>, "Jan Hellbusch" <hellbusch@web.de>, "AccessSystems" <accessys@smart.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
David, thanks! I had misinterpreted the implications. Of course, the stats refer to the number of tasks accomplished and not the necessitated time to fulfill a task. Recently, I was reading about the reading efficiency of partially sighted in comparison to Braille readers, wherby Braille readers were substantially faster. Somehor that was still sticking in my mind. Jan + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + http://www.malerecke.de -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: David Poehlman [mailto:poehlman1@home.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2001 15:57 An: Jan Hellbusch; AccessSystems; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Betreff: Re: Nielson Norman Group Accessibility was: Re: 170147_1.html (fwd) not unless the others are typos too. <grin> I actually find the screen reader one acceedingly low considering I am a screen reader user myself and get about 80 percent. I'd have to look at their study but I am not inclined to pay that high a price for it. One thing that is needed here though is to look at the relative relationships. a screen reader user needs to become familiar with things in ways that a controll does not so that should have been taken into account. Now, if there are accessibility issues that is a different thing. Also, I don't think 104 constitutes a good sample unless they are well distributed across technical capability and other lines. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Hellbusch" <hellbusch@web.de> To: "AccessSystems" <accessys@smart.net>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:18 AM Subject: Nielson Norman Group Accessibility was: Re: 170147_1.html (fwd) In the NNG report the control group is quoted to have needed substantially longer than screen reader/screen magnifier users:: > * Task completion rate: Screen reader users were able to complete > the tasks given to them 12.5% of the time; screen magnifier users > 21.4% of the time; control group 78% of the time. While first reading, I read 7.8% for the control group, which would correspond to my experiences. Could the 78% be a typo or scanning error? Jan _______________________________________________________________________ 1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de IhrName@web.de, 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2001 15:38:41 UTC