- From: Ken Reader <kreader@attaininc.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 08:49:53 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DF1E0454B385774FA500E4CD4089F4D30254D0@attaininc.org>
I agree with joel. With all the trouble it takes to make the pdf accessible it is just easier to go ahead and put it up in html. Ken Reader IT Coordinator ATTAIN, Inc. 2346 S. Lynhurst Drive STE 507 Indianapolis, IN 46241 Telephone (317) 486-8808 Fax (317) 486-8809 -----Original Message----- From: Joel Ward [mailto:ward_joel@bah.com] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:40 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility The rare PDF that includes internal navigation is tolerable, but I have never found a PDF that is as easy to read in a browser as a standard HTML document. If I want to read the content in full, I will usually print the PDF. I've gone through many wasted reams of paper that way. :-) Much like with HTML pages, PDFs can be done well and PDFs can be done poorly. The fault often lies with the document's designer/coder. For viewing online, you can make a PDF document work much like a standard HTML page. But why bother? Just make a standard HTML page! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spinsol.com> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:23 AM Subject: RE: Acrobat PDF & Accessibility > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Does anyone actually like reading PDFs in a browser? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> > > iQA/AwUBPCM33YFpv9f1Mr0YEQIK/wCg0TDuRQUDGofoC4vgUgfc79+t9uAAoPKH > 4TfA3Z3iJP8QPMzBCYh3ny8V > =CRpg > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
Received on Friday, 21 December 2001 08:53:29 UTC