Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired

the cascade is like this:
1> do accessible.
2 which can go with one> serve content based on user requests/indicated
capabilities.  this refers to machines talking to one another.
3> as a last resort, provide separate web sets but make them congruent
and synchronous through out.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net>
To: <poehlman1@home.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired


Hi,

I just realized I made a punctuation / typing error in this sentence.  I
meant to finish it with a question mark.

                          According to the 2.0 guidelines it is OK
  for Amazon to have multiple versions of the same web page in order
  to meet the various guidelines?

Scott

> Hi,
>
> OK.  Just to be clear.  According to the 2.0 guidelines it is OK
> for Amazon to have multiple versions of the same web page in order
> to meet the various guidelines.  The problems with the alternative
> web pages are that they probably don't have the same URL and that
> the alternative web pages don't meet the guidelines.
>
> This means that the issue they french blind people brought about
> ghettoizing is not a concern addressed by the standards.
>
> Scott
>

Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 16:59:04 UTC