- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 16:59:17 -0500
- To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
the cascade is like this: 1> do accessible. 2 which can go with one> serve content based on user requests/indicated capabilities. this refers to machines talking to one another. 3> as a last resort, provide separate web sets but make them congruent and synchronous through out. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net> To: <poehlman1@home.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:23 PM Subject: Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired Hi, I just realized I made a punctuation / typing error in this sentence. I meant to finish it with a question mark. According to the 2.0 guidelines it is OK for Amazon to have multiple versions of the same web page in order to meet the various guidelines? Scott > Hi, > > OK. Just to be clear. According to the 2.0 guidelines it is OK > for Amazon to have multiple versions of the same web page in order > to meet the various guidelines. The problems with the alternative > web pages are that they probably don't have the same URL and that > the alternative web pages don't meet the guidelines. > > This means that the issue they french blind people brought about > ghettoizing is not a concern addressed by the standards. > > Scott >
Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 16:59:04 UTC