- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 08:37:55 -0700
- To: "Simon White" <simon.white@jkd.co.uk>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 04:41 AM 10/9/2001 , Simon White wrote: >Dear fellow listers, >I am under the impression that the 'Click Here' text that often appears on alt tags is a big no-no. Many of the replies to this have been based on the idea that "click here" is somehow inherently bad. There are two reasons one might think "click here" is an accessibility error -- of those reasons, one is a valid reason and one is not. The valid reason: A link that says "click here" or anything else that's very generic such as "follow this link" is harder to use because there's no content in that link nor a sense of what it actually does. (The same argument could also be given for "D" links, by the way!) The more generic the link, the more difficult the site is to navigate. Instead, using more specific link text is almost always better. (This reason also makes sense if you list links out of context, although it must be stated that doing such and expecting it to work is an unreasonable assumption given the nature of hypertext.) The spurious reason: Some people believe "click here" is bad because it's "mouse-centric" and "not everyone clicks." This type of control over language is misguided and dangerous, because it is _not_ an accessibility error. I have never heard of, for example, a screenreader or keyboard user who was completely stymied upon encountering "click here" as text. Everyone in such a situation knows that "click here" is slang for "select this link", and in truth, nearly every way of choosing a link, short of voice control, probably involves a "click" even if it's a keyclick. So if you're worried about "click here" because it's not "inclusive" or something, STOP RIGHT THERE, that's a false premise and it's _not_ what accessibility is about. Instead you should be concerned about actual issues of access to information, ease of use, functionality, and usability. Note that in many cases (run your own tests if you don't believe me!), proper use of "click here" -- such as "click here to download now!" or "click here for page two" -- will improve the usability of a design, simply because explicit directions are very useful. That's my advice on "click here". The words itself are not and should not be "taboo", but bad link text is always a problem. Let's concentrate on that problem, and not try to rewrite Internet slang. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 11:47:51 UTC