- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 19:41:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
This is not true. There are two potential patents that are known, and neither is expected to have any impact on SVG tools. There is at least one free open source tool, that implements accessibility features and is one of the leaders in implementation of the entire specification - Batik. Currently SVG has beena recommendation for weeks, and the developers are racing to make the two leading implementations (Adobe and Batik, although this is only my opinion) both implement the entire specifcation as soon as possible. There iis information that actually specifies how far SVG is implemented, and information about the specification, and tools, available from the Public pages of the Working Group that produced it. http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, David Woolley wrote: > the release and pursuance of SVG as a format forma for embedded imagery, Very little of the discussion on SVG has been about simple imagery, most of it has been as an alternative for Flash animations. > tough a long way from being widespread > does lead to some hope in the development of truly accessible resources.. Why? SVG has more power than Acrobat, so, with similar authoring tools is capable of producing even more inaccessible material. It is also potentially less open than Acrobat, in as much as I believe that several companies claim that patent royalties are required to implement SVG, whereas, as far as I know, it is possible to implement Acrobat royalty free, at least if you implement it properly according to the specification. Currently there are lots of incomplete implementations of SVG, which will cause its own problems in terms of non-portable pages. The IPR constraints may result in partial implementations as freeware, with commercial implementation being more complete. If you were comparing with Flash, I might agree. > 1.This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above > named only and may be confidential. Any opinions expressed Please note that the mailing list is available as public archives, not just to the members of the mailing list. -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 26 October 2001 19:41:34 UTC