- From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 19:16:26 +0000
- To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@home.com>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 15:19, David Poehlman wrote: | unfortunately or fortunately, there are many reasons why lynx is pivotal | and we are lucky if it is the one chosen as minimal. try http://www.nbcolympics.com/, or http://www.nbcolympics.com/x/f/frame.htm?u=/news/nbcomain_front.asp with Lynx :-) // I am not saying that Lynx is bad, nbcolympics.com is crap. But anyway... | | ----- Original Message ----- | >like what LYNX does so much better. especially it is "Clean and Fast" | | I'm not stating a popularity contest of browsers here -- I like Lynx | myself -- but I feel that the limited capabilities of Lynx make it a | poor baseline for accessibility. It is too limited of a browser to | make it the minimal browser; it doesn't meet the basic requirements | of a 21st century web access software system. | | --Kynn -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) 33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html KDE mini-Themes http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/
Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2001 11:13:20 UTC