On Wednesday 26 December 2001 15:19, David Poehlman wrote: | unfortunately or fortunately, there are many reasons why lynx is pivotal | and we are lucky if it is the one chosen as minimal. try http://www.nbcolympics.com/, or http://www.nbcolympics.com/x/f/frame.htm?u=/news/nbcomain_front.asp with Lynx :-) // I am not saying that Lynx is bad, nbcolympics.com is crap. But anyway... | | ----- Original Message ----- | >like what LYNX does so much better. especially it is "Clean and Fast" | | I'm not stating a popularity contest of browsers here -- I like Lynx | myself -- but I feel that the limited capabilities of Lynx make it a | poor baseline for accessibility. It is too limited of a browser to | make it the minimal browser; it doesn't meet the basic requirements | of a 21st century web access software system. | | --Kynn -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) 33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html KDE mini-Themes http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2001 11:13:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:16 UTC