- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 17:06:30 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> > This is a good point. But I would be surprised if the result of running a > document through a PDF to HTML conversion chagnes the copyright status, which > would mean that having tested / improved the result, you can post it as an > alternative form. Did you mean can't post, rather than can post? This is a feature of PDF that may well make content providers reluctant to provide alternative forms with lesser technical imposition of IPR constraints. (PDF, in general, has a lot of features aimed at commercial users. The only real IPR support in browsers at the moment is that which requires downloadable fonts to be tied to a site - one reason why downloadable fonts aren't much used.)
Received on Sunday, 23 December 2001 12:06:33 UTC