- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 17:39:33 -0800
- To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@home.com>, "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net>, <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 3:08 PM -0500 12/24/01, David Poehlman wrote: >there are issues and solutions and some times the lines blurr in both. >You have it the rong way round though. You start with the right page >and go from there. assuming right is as right as you can get it without >being too right. Start with css for instance, and you might not even >need tables. Er, sorry, no. CSS support is _not_ currently good enough that you don't need tables, and in fact, apart from older screenreaders which did not understand them, tables for layout are not a barrier to access, no more or less than CSS. Lemme say that again since it rarely gets said: LAYOUT TABLES DO NOT PRESENT ANY MORE OR LESS A BARRIER TO ACCESS THAN DOES CSS. Sorry to shout. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Monday, 24 December 2001 21:33:02 UTC