Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities

At 5:46 PM -0500 12/26/01, David Poehlman wrote:
>I almost missed this comment.  Lynx is not a target of uaag.

Why not?

(Well, I suppose it's because we all recognize that Lynx is such
a limited HTML-viewer that it's unreasonable to require that it
be accessible, because it lacks basic functionality beyond HTML
display -- but then that was my point to begin with.)

--Kynn

-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                 http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain            http://idyllmtn.com
Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire          http://kynn.com/resume
January Web Accessibility eCourse           http://kynn.com/+d201

Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2001 17:58:01 UTC