- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@sonic.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 10:25:22 -0800
- To: kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com, phoenixl@sonic.net, poehlman1@home.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, At this point, it seems to be the only document that appears to be based on research and observation. The general approach for evaluating this type of document when there is disagreement is to conduct additional research and observation which provides data showing the problems. If there are known quantities, what are they? Also, what techniques have been used which substantiate and move them from being conjectures arising from anecdotes? Scott > and if they choose to listen, I have found in my research of this > document that it is not as close to the mark as it could be. I'd > suggest we stick to known quantities and wait for a time when there is a > real tome on this topic.
Received on Monday, 24 December 2001 13:25:27 UTC