- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 07:16:38 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "Rebecca Cox" <rebecca@cwa.co.nz>
- Cc: <birnie@tki.org.nz>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rebecca Cox" <rebecca@cwa.co.nz> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Cc: <birnie@tki.org.nz> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:49 AM Subject: RE: Screen readers and full stops + seperating links! <snipped: But has anyone asked before - why are we meant to make sure there is a non-linked character between adjacent links? I can easily change the settings on HPR so that this would not be needed - I've set it so that a "ping" sounds before each link is read out, thus seperating adjacent links. It seems like a double standard to me. What do others think? Cheers The developpers of the guidelines did a lot of research that indicated and still indicates that this is necessary for many who are not using high tech browsers such as hpr 3.0. It is also an aid to the sighted who need that little extra bit of assistance when looking at a page.
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 07:16:43 UTC