- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 08:38:13 -0500
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
for the sake of contenuity of the thread and so that we can rip you apart if need be in a neutral place as it were, I'd hope you would put your statement here. Other good reasons for this have already been pointed out. If you do not publish it here I hope someone will find it and bring it to us. Thanks <grin> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com> To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org> Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 9:12 PM Subject: Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities At 9:07 PM -0500 12/26/01, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >When this thread started it was about what are the minimum capabilities we >can expect users to have (through their browsers). Very little data has come >out of it, so I am going to break this question into several smaller >questions, and see if we can get more signal. I think you were right at the start of the thread (and I was wrong); the "minimum browser capabilities" discussion is a topic for WCAG and not general IG talk. I'll post a reply there. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Thursday, 27 December 2001 08:37:48 UTC