- From: claude sweet <sweetent@home.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:00:28 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Please excuse my ignorance, I lack a programing background and thought someone on this list might have an answer. The first word processor I used required the insertion of codes to produce various effects - bold, italic words, etc. This concept, if technically feasible, would allow the person creating the content to control what text/graphics would be read by the screen reader. All a person would have to do would be to insert a specific start and stop command to instruct screen reading software to skip the content between these commands. This approach would eliminate all of the problems associated with attempting to render graphics and text that would cause confusion if attempted to be converted into sound. Claude Sweet San Diego, CA -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Phillip Pi Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:13 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: ASCII Ribbon Campaign DOH! I guess my ASCII art is considered an accessibility barrier too. [runs away] Actually, what happens if a screen reader or any other device attempts to read my signature?
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2001 17:07:54 UTC