- From: Hewitt, Denise <Denise.Hewitt@idea.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:35:10 -0600
- To: "'David Poehlman'" <poehlman1@home.com>, Viral.Patel@exim.gov, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I agree with David - you aren't going to be able to have a program give you a 100% a-okay when there is stuff that has to be checked manually. I would validate the page in something other - view it in a multitude of browsers (IE, Netscape, Lynx, IBM Home Page Reader) & make sure that the tables are all linear - ie: that the information presents in the same order regardless of what browser is used. Best regards, Denise -----Original Message----- From: David Poehlman [mailto:poehlman1@home.com] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:30 AM To: Viral.Patel@exim.gov; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Headers for tables used for layout seems to me that this one of those machine gotchas. I'd leave it as is if you can live with the imperfect report. ----- Original Message ----- From: <Viral.Patel@exim.gov> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:17 AM Subject: Headers for tables used for layout Hi Everybody I use InFocus 4.1 for checking pages for accessibility, it shows violation for a table, but I have used the table only for layout, so I don't want to specify headers for it. Is there any way, I can put additional tags in the <table so that screen reader considers it has a layout table, not data table? Thanks Viral Patel
Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 10:35:57 UTC