- From: Rebecca Cox <rebecca@cwa.co.nz>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:18:32 +1300
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Thanks. One more question: Does it matter if the name and title attribute are different? The names in the code are not very informative and I would like to put in title attribs that will explain things a bit more. Rebecca At 6:54 PM -0600 10/28/01, Jim Thatcher wrote: >On all frames I would use both title and name attribute. Also titles on the >frame pages. This is because currently a preponderance of assistive >technology is either using name or title on pages and NOT using the title >attribute. > >That said, even an empty frame will appear in frame lists, so put the >informative name="EmptyFrame" title="Empty Frame" for that one. > >Jim >jim@jimthatcher.com >Accessibility Consulting >http://jimthatcher.com >512-306-0931 > >-----Original Message----- >From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On >Behalf Of Rebecca Cox >Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 3:57 PM >To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >Subject: title for empty frames > > >I'm fixing up frame title tags on an existing page. There seems to be >at least one frame in the page which is empty - sort of like a spacer >image. (I didn't make the page, I'm just trying to fix it up a bit, >so no rude comments please!) > >Would it be best to treat this like a spacer image and give it > ><frame src="nocontent.html" title=""> > >?? Suggestions would be most welcome. > >Cheers
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2001 20:36:39 UTC