xml-uri@w3.org from May 2000 by thread

a few open questions Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 31 May)

Ignore that - Re: Attribute uniqueness test: a radical proposal Tim Berners-Lee (Tuesday, 30 May)

eXtensible Programming Language Michael Lauzon (Monday, 29 May)

Attribute uniqueness test: a radical proposal Paul W. Abrahams (Saturday, 27 May)

Namespaces and namespace names: a new synthesis? John Cowan (Wednesday, 26 May)

Namespace names: a semi-serious proposal Paul W. Abrahams (Friday, 26 May)

Inclusion loops Robin Berjon (Thursday, 25 May)

inclusion Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 25 May)

XML semantics was: Web Architecture, 'XML Autonomy' Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 24 May)

RE: A little courtesy, please (resource questions) Jonathan Marsh (Wednesday, 24 May)

Namespace URI schemes John Aldridge (Wednesday, 24 May)

peace and quiet David Carlisle (Wednesday, 24 May)

URI versus URI Reference Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 23 May)

please limit nested inclusion of previous messages? Weibel,Stu (Tuesday, 23 May)

What's [in] a resource? Al Gilman (Tuesday, 23 May)

A little courtesy, please Tim Bray (Tuesday, 23 May)

J. Clark on Bats Tim Bray (Tuesday, 23 May)

Call the question! keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 22 May)

RFC 2396 Michael Mealling (Monday, 22 May)

Re: Dictionaries in the library Tim Berners-Lee (Sunday, 21 May)

mid: (was RE: Irony heaped on irony) James Tauber (Sunday, 21 May)

Thoughts from an external observer Eric van der Vlist (Sunday, 21 May)

RDF namespace conventions Tim Berners-Lee (Sunday, 21 May)

Dictionares in the library Tim Berners-Lee (Sunday, 21 May)

Ownership of namespaces (was: Problems I cannot get past with using relative URIs for identity.) Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Sunday, 21 May)

NS 1.1 ??? (was RE: Use cases) Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com (Sunday, 21 May)

SIgh [was: Irony heaped on irony] Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 20 May)

Re: Persistent caches - Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 20 May)

RE: Persistent caches - was: Are *relative* URIs as namespace nem es considered harmful? James Tauber (Saturday, 20 May)

Name services was: Persistent caches - was: ... Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 20 May)

URIs don't force behavior [was: Why are relative NS identifiers used?] Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 20 May)

Database example; was: Why are relative NS identifiers used? Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 20 May)

The "data:" URI scheme considered helpful John Cowan (Friday, 19 May)

RE: URLs for Namespaces: I don't buy it keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 19 May)

Re: URLs for Namespaces: I don't buy it keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 19 May)

Re: Not-So-Pretty Staged Plan (fwd) Clark C. Evans (Friday, 19 May)

credit due W. E. Perry (Friday, 19 May)

Re: Irony heaped on irony (packaging and schemas) Dan Connolly (Friday, 19 May)

RE: Irony heaped on irony Pawson, David (Friday, 19 May)

When are 2 URI's the same? Anthony B. Coates, ESL +61 2 9373 7972 Sydney (Friday, 19 May)

Defaule base URI for files Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 18 May)

Re: Terminology: `absolutization' is vile, but nothing else is better keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 18 May)

status quo Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 18 May)

URLs for Namespaces: I don't buy it David Hunter (Thursday, 18 May)

Re: Irony heaped on irony Dan Connolly (Thursday, 18 May)

Re: Fwd: Persistent caches - was: Are *relative* URIs as namespace nemes considered harmful? Norman Walsh (Thursday, 18 May)

Toward the self-describing web [was: Irony heaped on irony] Dan Connolly (Thursday, 18 May)

Why are relative NS identifiers used? Rick JELLIFFE (Tuesday, 16 May)

the case of two bats Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 16 May)

Empty URIs Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 18 May)

Persistent caches - was: Are *relative* URIs as namespace nemes considered harmful? Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 17 May)

Problems I cannot get past with using relative URIs for identity. Ray Whitmer (Wednesday, 17 May)

A proposal Steve Rowe (Wednesday, 17 May)

Fwd: Irony heaped on irony Simon St.Laurent (Wednesday, 17 May)

URLs and URNs David Hunter (Wednesday, 17 May)

Re: Comments on straw poll John Cowan (Wednesday, 17 May)

RE: Rules for absolutizing: was Re: Are *relative* URIs as namespace nemes considered harmful? Paul Grosso (Wednesday, 17 May)

Namespace Identifier: The Hook Jonathan Robie (Wednesday, 17 May)

Theory and practice of URIs and Namespace names Larry Masinter (Tuesday, 16 May)

Dereferencability was: URIs as namespaces Tim Berners-Lee (Tuesday, 16 May)

RE: Are *relative* URIs as namespace names considered harmful? Dan Vint (Tuesday, 16 May)

A minor point about xmlns="" John Cowan (Tuesday, 16 May)

The trouble with absolutizing... John Cowan (Tuesday, 16 May)

Namespace names and URIs Tim Bray (Tuesday, 16 May)

Re: Are *relative* URIs as namespace nemes considered harmful Jonathan Robie (Monday, 15 May)

Having your strings and identity too.... Jonathan Robie (Monday, 15 May)

URIs as namespaces Paul Prescod (Monday, 15 May)

Are *relative* URIs as namespace nemes considered harmful? Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 15 May)

Joining/leaving xml-URI@w3.org Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 15 May)

Re: W3C XML "Coordination" Hassle Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 15 May)

Welcome to the XML-URI list Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 15 May)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 May 2000 18:13:54 UTC