Re: looking for packaging, not a schema (-NOT, counterproposal)

At 11:04 AM 5/18/00 -0500, Al Gilman wrote:
>The definition of packaging I am using is the creation of portable
>super-documents. 
>
>Using relative URI bindings between documents in a local address subtree in
>effect creates a portable super-document.  Because it performs this central
>function of packaging I termed it "virtual packaging."  

So in this case the document _is_ its own package?

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com

Received on Thursday, 18 May 2000 10:55:51 UTC