W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

RE: URLs for Namespaces: I don't buy it

From: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 14:45:16 -0400
To: David Hunter <david.hunter@mobileQ.COM>
cc: xml-uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <852568E4.0067051D.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>
>No, I don't think we can agree even on this.  There are those who would
say
>that the Namespace spec says exactly what it was supposed to say.  Well,
>okay, with the exception that they let relative URIs slip through...

If the phrase "URI References" had been replaced by  "strings in URI
Reference syntax," it would have said exactly what it meant to say.

Unfortunately that's not what some folks feel should have been intended.
Received on Friday, 19 May 2000 14:45:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC