- From: Josef Dietl <josef@mozquito.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 12:12:59 +0200
- To: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Cc: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, <xml-uri@w3.org>
Eric, ok, you caught me - I meant to say "scheme". Still: would somebody mind telling me when two URIs are the same? Honestly, I _believe_ I know when two URIs are equivalent - but that's not sufficiently formal to code it, and I haven't found a spec to tell me. There are several possible approaches, but it looks to me that specifying this equivalence relation is a way out of here without offending anyone. (no?) Josef -- Stack Overflow - We Help Increase Your Productivity With XHTML Visit http://www.mozquito.org > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:vdv@dyomedea.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Mai 2000 18:12 > An: Josef Dietl > Cc: Tim Berners-Lee; xml-uri@w3.org > Betreff: Re: AW: Are *relative* URIs as namespace > nemes considered > harmful? > > > Josef, just a formal minor point... > > Josef Dietl wrote: > > > > I've seen many people assuming that we know and that > it's only a > > question whether to absolutize or not, but looking > up RFC2396, I > > find that "equivalence" depends on the schema used > (section 6) > ^^^^^^ > > Don't you mean URI scheme instead of schema ? > > The confusion between XSchema and RDF schema is > already often made in > these discussions, please don't had a 3rd schema :=) !!! > > Eric > -- > ------------------------------------------------------- > ----------------- > Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea > http://dyomedea.com > http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org > http://ducotede.com > ------------------------------------------------------- > ----------------- >
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2000 06:03:08 UTC