- From: David E. Cleary <davec@progress.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 14:34:47 -0400
- To: <xml-uri@w3.org>
>I'd say it was incredibly poor design on the part of the chemical plant >handler, not on the part of the XML parser. (It sounds like XPath/XSLT >absolutizes anyway, so I don't think it would get that far anyway.) >So no, it's not a problem. You do not think it is a problem that the qualified names of two nodes are considered equal at the XML + Namespace layer, but unequal at the XPath/XSLT layer? Whatever is decided, they need to be consistent in my book. Qualified names should not arbitrarily change between layers. David Cleary Progress Software
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2000 14:36:42 UTC