W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Documents without a base URI

From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Date: Wed, 24 May 100 21:58:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200005250158.VAA23204@locke.ccil.org>
To: simonstl@simonstl.com (Simon St.Laurent)
Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> How do you absolutize a relative URI when there is no information about a
> base URI?

It's an error to have such a thing.

> I'm not sure that these cases "can't usefully contain... relative namespace
> names" - in fact, I'm quite sure that they could.  

Relative to what?

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
	Yes, I know the message date is bogus.  I can't help it.
		--me, on far too many occasions
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2000 21:35:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC