W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Use cases

From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 15:37:30 -0400
Message-Id: <200005161935.PAA00346@hesketh.net>
To: "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
At 02:44 PM 5/16/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
>> Also, are there use cases today where people have really gone ahead with
>> relative URIs namespaces?
>Yes.  Microsoft has distributed software which creates them, so that
>documents now exist which contain them, and are meant to be processed
according to
>the "literal" interpretation.
>For details, apply to your local Microsoft XML weenie.

Is there a local Microsoft XML weenie here?

'software' is awfully vague, and doesn't tell me which 'weenie'.  I've
never seen this behavior in my uses of Microsoft's XML tools, but it may
just be that I haven't wandered into the right pasture.

Also: has anyone else (non-MS) done this?

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2000 15:35:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC