Re: Call the question!

> It might.  In particular, the idea of "two kinds of namespace names"
> was NOT discussed to death on xml-core-wg and xml-plenary.  To restate:

1)

Well I would be perfectly happy with that proposal as it appears (from
my perspective) to be identical to the status quo.

For all uses as a namespace name the two kinds of namespace name would be
treated the same, as literal strings, wouldn't they?

1a)

In this case the interpretation of ./schema would change from the
current position and documents using that namespace string would
change their interpretation. So I would be a lot less happy with this
change (although from a purely selfish perspective it wouldn't break any
of my documents, as, as it happens if I use a relative URI reference as
a namespace name I just use a simple name with no /)


David

Received on Monday, 22 May 2000 14:14:39 UTC