- From: Paul W. Abrahams <abrahams@valinet.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 20:51:18 -0400
- To: xml-uri@w3.org
Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2000, james anderson wrote:
>
> >
> > Where the namespace rec defined namespace names such that "[it] is not a
> > goal that [a namespace URI] be directly uasble for retrieval of a
> > schema," but then proceeded to bind the xml prefix to a URI in the http
> > schema space, it was asking for trouble - a retrievable resource being a
> > part of the http semantic...
>
> There's nothing telling anyone to bind to a http URI. As I said in an
> earlier email, it's just a name.
The denotation is just a name. But the connotation is a resource. And the
connotation is what readers assume.
It reminds me of:
|\
| \
| \
---------------------------------- \
|
\
| K E E P T O T H E L E F
T \
|
/
|
/
---------------------------------- /
| /
| /
| /
Paul Abrahams
Received on Sunday, 21 May 2000 20:51:24 UTC