W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: looking for packaging, not a schema (-NOT, counterproposal)

From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 11:51:42 -0400
Message-Id: <200005181549.LAA05879@hesketh.net>
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, xml-uri@w3.org
At 11:52 AM 5/18/00 -0500, Al Gilman wrote:
>I would prefer to say the document, together with any documents on whose
>relative location it depends, such as schemas referenced using relative
>URIs, constitutes the package.

Alas.  This is exactly the model I was hoping we could escape.

See the opening of the XPDL drafts for an explanation:
http://www.simonstl.com/projects/xpdl/

I'll change my confusion to opposition, then. 

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2000 11:49:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC