Re: looking for packaging, not a schema (-NOT, counterproposal)

At 11:52 AM 5/18/00 -0500, Al Gilman wrote:
>I would prefer to say the document, together with any documents on whose
>relative location it depends, such as schemas referenced using relative
>URIs, constitutes the package.

Alas.  This is exactly the model I was hoping we could escape.

See the opening of the XPDL drafts for an explanation:
http://www.simonstl.com/projects/xpdl/

I'll change my confusion to opposition, then. 

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com

Received on Thursday, 18 May 2000 11:49:38 UTC