W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck)

From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 21:38:01 -0400
To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20000529213801.D14157@bailey.dscga.com>
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 09:27:26PM -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> At 08:57 PM 5/29/00 -0400, Clark C. Evans wrote:
> <snip>
> Does this sound like a plausible solution to our current quandary?

Sounds fine to me. It just means that I'll wait for 2.0 before I
implement anything using XML Namespaces. I don't mean that to be facetious.
Its just that, since I assumed (which was my fault) that namespace names
were URIs in all respects, I now consider this version to be broken for
my purposes...

That doesn't mean its broken for yours....


Michael Mealling	|      Vote Libertarian!       | www.rwhois.net/michael
Sr. Research Engineer   |   www.ga.lp.org/gwinnett     | ICQ#:         14198821
Network Solutions	|          www.lp.org          |  michaelm@netsol.com
Received on Monday, 29 May 2000 21:49:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:59 UTC