>> > One would expect a URI reference to be >> > a pointer to a URI, i.e., a doubly indirect specification of a >> > resource, and not some generalization or specialization of a URI. One would, but one would be wrong. I think the term came around from some thought such as "a reference using a URI" or something... I was not very involved in the haggles about terms. It is difficult to be close to English usage at the end of a lot of specification discussions. Doesn't the BNF define these terms? too late..going to bed... tReceived on Wednesday, 24 May 2000 19:18:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC