W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

URIs as namespaces

From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 16:56:57 -0400
Message-ID: <39206499.8EA3175B@prescod.net>
To: xml-uri@w3.org
Something which has always seemed obvious to me is that it should be
intrinsically obvious on the "client side" whether a name refers to
something which can be explicitly retrieved or whether it rather refers
to something imaginary that has no internal representation in a
computer. This becomes obvious in a variety of contexts:

 * students in any XML class ask about whether you must be connected to
the Internet when you use namespaces -- no matter how many times you
tell them no, they do not believe you because it is so non-intuitive.

 * email clients automatically "highlight" namespaces because they have
the same syntax as URL-retrievable information

 * XML language lawyers have huge flamewars about what XML vocabulary
should be the "referent" of the namespace link (XML Schema? DTD? Some
meta-schema document? Stylesheet?)

 * If there is such a referent, then it becomes ambiguous whether RDF
properties, etc. apply to the retrievable referent or to the abstract

I see the benefit in treating retrievable and irretrievable resources
"the same" in some contexts but I see no benefit in providing no
syntactic signal of whether they fall into the former or latter

 Paul Prescod
Received on Monday, 15 May 2000 16:56:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC